1978
DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400024827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diagnostic efficiency of some serological tests for bovine brucellosis

Abstract: SUMMARYResults obtained from 1887 sera using three serological tests for bovine brucellosis were compared with a serological classification of sera described as the 'probable infection status'. Sera showing apparent false positive and apparent false negative reactions were identified, and were subjected to supplementary testing as appropriate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest dose (7.8 x 1010 organisms) was in the range of the dose recommended for calflhood vaccination. The reduced dose that had been used in adult cattle in field trials (7,18,19) and is permitted in whole-herd vaccination under specific conditions (23) is intermediate between the two reduced doses studied here, i.e., 5 x 109 and 9 x iOW organisms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The highest dose (7.8 x 1010 organisms) was in the range of the dose recommended for calflhood vaccination. The reduced dose that had been used in adult cattle in field trials (7,18,19) and is permitted in whole-herd vaccination under specific conditions (23) is intermediate between the two reduced doses studied here, i.e., 5 x 109 and 9 x iOW organisms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…High levels of serum IgG2 antibody can cause false negative reactions in the CFT (Plackett & Alton, 1975). A previous survey of sera from Victorian cattle indicated that this occurred frequently, affected sera being positive by the RIA and often also by the less sensitive IHLT (Chappel et al 1978). However, that study was made early in the eradication programme, and may have included many older infected cattle whose IgG2 levels are higher (Williams & Millar, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from Standard Agglutination Tube (SAT) Buffered Brucella Antigen or card (CT) and Complement Fixation (CF) tests have been compared to determine agreement among tests, and suitability of serological * This study was supported in part by the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, F. C. HECK AND OTHERS methods, to evaluate the health status of the animal or herd exposed to B. abortus (Alton et at. 1975;Chappel et al 1978;Morgan, MacKinnon & Cullen, 1969;Morgan & Richards, 1974;Nicoletti, 1967;Rose & Roepke, 1957). Most cattle infected with B. abortus, except those which are recently infected, can be identified by the SAT test (Davies, 1971).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%