2022
DOI: 10.47162/rjme.62.4.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diagnostic challenges in a child with intestinal tuberculosis

Abstract: Introduction: Romania is one of the European countries with a significant burden of tuberculosis (TB). Although pulmonary TB is still highly prevalent, intestinal TB is very rare and remains a diagnosis of exclusion, especially in children. The authors aimed to raise the awareness on this pathology by discussing the challenges faced in the management of one difficult case. Case presentation: A 3-year-old boy was hospitalized in the Pediatrics Department of Grigore Alexandrescu Emergency Children's Hospital, Bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Various modalities contribute to GI–TB involvement, including ingestion of contaminated milk or food (primary TB), ingestion of contaminated sputum (secondary TB), hematogenous spread from a distant TB focus, or contiguous dissemination from infected neighboring foci via the lymphatic channels[ 18 , 19 ]. Given the absence of evidence of extra-abdominal TB in our case, we believe the infection to be primary gastric TB involving the peripancreatic lymph node.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various modalities contribute to GI–TB involvement, including ingestion of contaminated milk or food (primary TB), ingestion of contaminated sputum (secondary TB), hematogenous spread from a distant TB focus, or contiguous dissemination from infected neighboring foci via the lymphatic channels[ 18 , 19 ]. Given the absence of evidence of extra-abdominal TB in our case, we believe the infection to be primary gastric TB involving the peripancreatic lymph node.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 The cellular and surrounding microenvironment is susceptible to direct thermal damage after only a short period; interstitial changes occur after only 30 min at 40.5°C. 27…”
Section: Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 The cellular and surrounding microenvironment is susceptible to direct thermal damage after only a short period; interstitial changes occur after only 30 min at 40.5°C. 27 In addition to direct thermal damage, organ dysfunction may be due to hyperthermic damage rendering the intestinal barrier more permeable, allowing intestinal toxins such as bacteria, 28 endotoxin and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) 29 to enter the systemic circulation. Changes to the intestinal permeability can occur at modest temperatures, around 39°C, 30 and after a short period of hyperthermia, 1-2 h. 30 Intestinal permeability increases have been observed in humans during exertional hyperthermia.…”
Section: Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Небольшая доля гепатоцитов подвергалась деструктивным изменениям, содержала пикнотичные ядра в светлой гомогенной цитоплазме, изредка обнаруживались мелкие прозрачные вакуоли, которые могли появиться из-за развития дистрофических изменений гепатоцитов. Подобная морфологическая картина характерна либо для гидропической (вакуолярной), либо для жировой дистрофии [7,8]. При окраске криостатных срезов печени суданом черным В лишь в единичных клетках выявлялись мелкие капли жира (рис.…”
Section: результатыunclassified
“…Удельные объемы гепатоцитов, содержащих в цитоплазме вакуолярные включения, были наиболее выражены в группе 4 и значимо превышали показатели других исследованных групп. Гидропическая дистрофия чаще наблюдается при нарушении белкового метаболизма в печени в результате вирусного воздействия или кратковременной гипертермии [7]. Очаги клеточной инфильтрации Foci of cellular infiltratio 0,00 4 0,01 4 (0,00-0,01) 0,03 4 (0,00-0,03) 2,38 1, 2, 3 (2,38-2,38) Примечание: ВУВЖД -высокоуглеводная высокожировая диета, 1 -статистическая значимость различий по сравнению с группой 1, 2 -по сравнению с группой 2, 3 -по сравнению с группой 3; 4 -по сравнению с группой 4 при р ≤ 0,05.…”
Section: результатыunclassified