2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.11.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI for the detection of lymph node metastases in gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our knowledge, there is no such study carried out in North India to study the distribution and incidence of lymph nodal metastasis in carcinoma of the gallbladder. Our study findings for lymph nodal metastasis on CT scan was corresponding to CT scan findings in a meta-analysis by de Savornin Lohman et al 8 Some studies 8,9 have used a size criterion of >10 mm as a cutoff value of a diameter for labeling a lymph node positive. We have included size, heterogeneous enhancement, and necrotic lymph nodes as the criteria for lymph node involvement.…”
Section: Asian J Oncolsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to our knowledge, there is no such study carried out in North India to study the distribution and incidence of lymph nodal metastasis in carcinoma of the gallbladder. Our study findings for lymph nodal metastasis on CT scan was corresponding to CT scan findings in a meta-analysis by de Savornin Lohman et al 8 Some studies 8,9 have used a size criterion of >10 mm as a cutoff value of a diameter for labeling a lymph node positive. We have included size, heterogeneous enhancement, and necrotic lymph nodes as the criteria for lymph node involvement.…”
Section: Asian J Oncolsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, for the detection of lymph nodal metastasis of size < 10 mm, imaging is unreliable because in their study all false-negative lymph nodes were <10 mm in size. 8 In correspondence to Mitchell et al, we included lymph nodes that were either enlarged in size (>1 cm), heterogeneous intensity (indicating central necrosis), or altered morphology. 11 Pilgrim et al emphasized on the significance of preoperative scanning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with GBC was also reported with a sensitivity ranging from 0.25-0.93 for CT and 0.59-0.93 for MRI, and specificity of 1.00 for CT and 0.78-1.00 for MRI [25]. Small (<10 mm) lymph node metastases were frequently undetected in pre-operative imaging [25]. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of para-aortic lymph node metastasis has a reported sensitivity of 96.7% and a specificity of 100% [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The correct diagnostic rate for classification of malignant hilar obstruction, which corresponds to the "invasion of the left margin or entire areas of the hepatoduodenal ligament" in our study, has been reported to be 90.5% for CT and 81.0-85.7% for MRI, and may sometimes underestimate the degree of biliary stricture [24]. Moreover, the preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with GBC was also reported with a sensitivity ranging from 0.25-0.93 for CT and 0.59-0.93 for MRI, and specificity of 1.00 for CT and 0.78-1.00 for MRI [25]. Small (<10 mm) lymph node metastases were frequently undetected in pre-operative imaging [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CECT images were retrospectively analyzed by two radiologists (one with 8 years of abdominal imaging experience and one with 10 years of abdominal imaging experience) who were blinded to the clinical and pathological data. Assessments included the following: (1) lesion location (head, body or tail); (2) LN status based on abdominal imaging evaluation criteria (location, size, shape, and LN enhancement) [26,27]. If the evaluation results were different, the final data were obtained after consultation between the two observers.…”
Section: Ct Protocols and Radiographic Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%