1960
DOI: 10.1172/jci104022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma by Determination of Urinary 3-Methoxy,4-Hydroxymandelic Acid*†

Abstract: In 1957, Armstrong, McMillan and Shaw demonstrated a metabolite of epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE) in normal human urine (2, 3). This substance, 3-methoxy,4-hydroxymandelic acid (VMA, for vanillylmandelic acid), was excreted in abnormally large amounts in three patients with pheochromocytomas (3). Recent studies of sympathomimetic amine metabolism (Figure 1) (4-7) suggested that the urinary excretion of the degradation products of E and NE, such as their 3-methylated derivatives (M and NM respectively)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

1961
1961
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although most patients with pheochromocytoma exhibit a diagnostic increase in their urinary excretion of free catecholamines and all metabolites, occasional patients have an increase in free catecholamine excretion in the presence of a normal excretion of VMA (5), whereas others are reported to show an increase in VMA excretion in the presence of normal or near normal values for free urinary NE and E (19,26). It is important to recognize that both situations may occur and that the diagnostic value of a given assay (e.g., free catecholamines versus VMA excretion), particularly in a patient with a minimal increase in total catecholamine production, may depend upon the degree of in situ metabolism and upon the secretion rate of the tumor at the time of the urine collection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most patients with pheochromocytoma exhibit a diagnostic increase in their urinary excretion of free catecholamines and all metabolites, occasional patients have an increase in free catecholamine excretion in the presence of a normal excretion of VMA (5), whereas others are reported to show an increase in VMA excretion in the presence of normal or near normal values for free urinary NE and E (19,26). It is important to recognize that both situations may occur and that the diagnostic value of a given assay (e.g., free catecholamines versus VMA excretion), particularly in a patient with a minimal increase in total catecholamine production, may depend upon the degree of in situ metabolism and upon the secretion rate of the tumor at the time of the urine collection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dose of reserpine known to interfere with sympathetic activity but failing to elicit a change in excretion of endogenous catecholamine catabolites, nonetheless resulted in a marked abnormality in the metabolic handling of labeled norepinephrine. It is anticipated that such studies may not only be of value in measuring sympathetic activity in the intact human INTRODUCTION Although evaluation of human adrenergic activity was considerably advanced by the discovery and measurement of norepinephrine (NE)1 and its catabolites in human plasma or urine, these biochemical techniques often lacked the sensitivity to elucidate subtle physiologic changes, pathologic variations, or abnormalities resulting from drug administration (1)(2)(3)(4). By 1959, it was apparent that injected, labeled catecholamines were only degraded and excreted in part, and that a significant fraction was stored intact (5,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gitlow et al 17 proposed hypothetically that a deficiency of O-methyl transferase in the vascular wall might delay the decomposition of catecholamine in the arterial wall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%