2001
DOI: 10.1067/mcd.2001.115501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diagnosis of heart disease by clinical assessment alone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assessed the participants’ performance using a standardized checklist (see figure 2 (Fig. 2) ) [ 22 ], [ 23 ]. This checklist has been adapted from a cardiac findings checklist by Hatala et al [ 24 ] to match the participants’ clinical knowledge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed the participants’ performance using a standardized checklist (see figure 2 (Fig. 2) ) [ 22 ], [ 23 ]. This checklist has been adapted from a cardiac findings checklist by Hatala et al [ 24 ] to match the participants’ clinical knowledge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subtle cardiovascular signs may be present in pulse wave abnormalities (Table 5). 51,52 The head and neck examination should include the following basic components: inspection of the head; eye gaze and vision; nose and symmetry of turbinates and septum; teeth, posterior oropharynx, and tonsils; ear canals and tympanic membranes; and palpation for enlarged cervical lymph nodes or thyroid. If symptomatic abnormalities are identified, the athlete should be referred for appropriate management.…”
Section: Physical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiovascular examination with the acoustic stethoscope has been a time‐honoured approach for over 200 years (Bedford, 1972; Jay, 2000; Chizner, 2002). The audible presence of extra heart sounds, cardiac murmurs, and accentuations of normal sounds have given the physician insight into cardiac physiology and pathophysiology and have been corroborated by echocardiography (Hanna & Silverman, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%