2019
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diabetes-atrial fibrillation paradox

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent study investigating the ethnic differences in HF patients with AF reported that Asian HF patients with AF were older and showed higher rates of HT, stroke, and COPD and lower rates of diabetes, which were similar to our study results. The authors regarded this condition a "diabetes-AF paradox" and suggested that diabetes is a protector of left atrium remodeling and that it can be associated with a lower risk of AF development (41,42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study investigating the ethnic differences in HF patients with AF reported that Asian HF patients with AF were older and showed higher rates of HT, stroke, and COPD and lower rates of diabetes, which were similar to our study results. The authors regarded this condition a "diabetes-AF paradox" and suggested that diabetes is a protector of left atrium remodeling and that it can be associated with a lower risk of AF development (41,42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now extend this paradoxical association for the first time to a larger cohort across Asia in both HFrEF and HFpEF. The exact mechanisms remain unknown, although we have previously thought it unlikely to be an effect of collider bias 17 . Separately, diabetic medications had been reported to decrease the risk of AF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The exact mechanisms remain unknown, although we have previously thought it unlikely to be an effect of collider bias. 17 Separately, diabetic medications had been reported to decrease the risk of AF. Modulation of electrical and mechanical properties of pulmonary veins and atria by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, inhibition of inflammation and oxidation by metformin and reduction of proarrhythmic substrates via inhibition of ATP-sensitive potassium channels by glibenclamide and tolbutamide have been suggested to confer protective benefits against AF.…”
Section: Diabetes-atrial Fibrillation Paradoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burden and Timpson raise the concern that collider bias might be present; specifically, that the inclusion of only patients with HF leads to an apparent relationship between two variables (ie, AF and diabetes) that are both causally related to the variable used to select the study cohort (ie, HF) (figure 4). Tan and colleagues5 respond in a letter: ’If collider bias from HF-only selection explains the diabetes–AF paradox, it is difficult to understand why collider bias would apply to Asians but not NZ–Europeans, or to preserved but not reduced ejection fraction HF (regardless of ethnicity), in cohorts simultaneously recruited using identical protocols. Also difficult to explain is why collider bias would not similarly impact hypertension and other HF risk factors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%