2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The devolution of urban food waste governance: Case study of food rescue in Los Angeles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By far the most common method reported was case-study research: 43 of the articles (38.1%) reported on either single case studies or very small-N comparative case studies (three or fewer cases). Researchers used case studies to answer a wide range of questions about food justice, for instance analyzing the individual and community impacts of social programs (Alkon 2007, White 2011a, Freudenberg et al 2011, Kato 2013, Bradley and Galt 2014, Agnelli et al 2016, Sbicca 2016); assessing how communities or organizations responded to specific challenges (Shawki and Renting 2012, Minkoff-Zern 2014a, Warshawsky 2015, Elmes et al 2016; or reporting on the accomplishments and challenges of various policy innovations (Essex 2011, Mansfield and Mendes 2013, Walker 2016. Other common qualitative methods included interviews (18 articles or 15.9%); participant observation (nine articles or 8.0%); meta-analysis of existing literature (eight articles or 7.1%); ethnography (seven articles or 6.2%); and historical analysis (six articles or 5.3%) 5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By far the most common method reported was case-study research: 43 of the articles (38.1%) reported on either single case studies or very small-N comparative case studies (three or fewer cases). Researchers used case studies to answer a wide range of questions about food justice, for instance analyzing the individual and community impacts of social programs (Alkon 2007, White 2011a, Freudenberg et al 2011, Kato 2013, Bradley and Galt 2014, Agnelli et al 2016, Sbicca 2016); assessing how communities or organizations responded to specific challenges (Shawki and Renting 2012, Minkoff-Zern 2014a, Warshawsky 2015, Elmes et al 2016; or reporting on the accomplishments and challenges of various policy innovations (Essex 2011, Mansfield and Mendes 2013, Walker 2016. Other common qualitative methods included interviews (18 articles or 15.9%); participant observation (nine articles or 8.0%); meta-analysis of existing literature (eight articles or 7.1%); ethnography (seven articles or 6.2%); and historical analysis (six articles or 5.3%) 5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the role that food surplus redistribution can play towards realising sustainable food is questioned [28,78]. It is argued that food surplus donations though civil society organizations, in fact, depoliticise food issues, focus on individual personal responsibility, and fail to address structural poverty [79,80]. Most studies acknowledge the need for more holistic understanding of the problem, and call for interventions at the individual, organisational, and policy levels [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the US, a range of local food waste reduction initiatives has emerged within the last 10 years; however, given the country's decentralised mode of governance, disinclination towards government regulation, and limited interest or knowledge in food waste, reducing food waste has been difficult (Evans et al . ; Warshawsky ). According to Gustavsson et al .…”
Section: Food Waste Sustainability and The Corporate Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%