2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58568-6_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Devil Is in the Details: Self-supervised Attention for Vehicle Re-identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the method including both two attribute models achieves higher Top-1 accuracy. [11] 0.611 0.562 0.514 AAVER [21] 0.747 0.686 0.635 RAM [20] 0.752 0.723 0.677 Part-regularized [18] 0.784 0.750 0.742 SAN [23] 0.797 0.784 0.756 SAVER [22] 0.799 0.776 0.753 HCANet 0.837 0.811 0.780…”
Section: Ablation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the method including both two attribute models achieves higher Top-1 accuracy. [11] 0.611 0.562 0.514 AAVER [21] 0.747 0.686 0.635 RAM [20] 0.752 0.723 0.677 Part-regularized [18] 0.784 0.750 0.742 SAN [23] 0.797 0.784 0.756 SAVER [22] 0.799 0.776 0.753 HCANet 0.837 0.811 0.780…”
Section: Ablation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AAVER [21] is a dual-path model which combines macroscopic global and local features. SAVER [22] learns vehicle-specific discriminative features based on self-supervised attention without additional annotations. According to the comparison results in Tab.2, our method achieves the best Top-1 accuracy among other methods on VehicleID dataset.…”
Section: Benchmark Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the artificial features depend on human experience to a large extent, and the deep information of image is not easy to be mined, so the effectiveness of artificial features is hard to be ensured. Therefore, the deep learning based vehicle recognition algorithms are paid more attention in recent years, which include some traditional deep learning models such as Convolutional Neural Network model [13][14][15], Deep Belief Network model [16][17], Transfer learning model [18][19][20], Restricted Boltzmann Machine [21][22][23], and some improved models such as Conv5 [24], Teacher-Student Network [25], Parsing-based View-aware Embedding Network [26], Semantics-guided Part Attention Network [27], the model fused by multiple networks [28], and the network based on reconstruction [29], et al For the supervised vehicle classification problem, these deep learning methods have achieved good results, but for vehicle face matching problem under the conditions that the times of each vehicle being captured is very limited and the number of the training samples is too small, the universalities of these models are not very well. Therefore, under a limited number of vehicle face samples, it is very meaningful to propose a vehicle re-identification algorithm with good robustness and universality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-based approaches: PGAN [51], PRN [11], PVEN [29], and GLAMOR [39]; (2) attribute-based approaches: AGNet-ASL [42], DJDL [24], XG-6-sub-multi [53], and SAN [32]; (3) attention-based approaches: AAVER [18] and SEVER [19]; (4) other interesting approaches: GSTE [1], VAMI [56], and DCDLearn [59].…”
Section: Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%