2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Developmental Trajectory of Brain-Scalp Distance from Birth through Childhood: Implications for Functional Neuroimaging

Abstract: Measurements of human brain function in children are of increasing interest in cognitive neuroscience. Many techniques for brain mapping used in children, including functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), use probes placed on or near the scalp. The distance between the scalp and the brain is a key variable for these techniques because optical, electrical and magnetic signals are attenuated by distance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
70
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(141 reference statements)
6
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…fNIRS is limited to imaging superficial regions of cortex, as the light cannot penetrate the tissue to measure deeper structures. In addition, scalp thickness has a significant impact of the ability of fNIRS to image cortical activity (Cui et al 2011; Beauchamp et al 2011). There is no doubt that fNIRS has poor spatial localization when compared against fMRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…fNIRS is limited to imaging superficial regions of cortex, as the light cannot penetrate the tissue to measure deeper structures. In addition, scalp thickness has a significant impact of the ability of fNIRS to image cortical activity (Cui et al 2011; Beauchamp et al 2011). There is no doubt that fNIRS has poor spatial localization when compared against fMRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The light from each source was received by neighboring detectors in the array, giving a potential of 96 source-detector pairings (or channels) on each side of the head. In order to optimally probe the cortex, we only analyzed the 31 channels in which the source-detector distance was 3.0-3.3 cm (Sevy et al 2010; Beauchamp et al 2011; Pollonini et al 2014). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the density and spatial distribution of electrical current in the brain in children may differ from that in adults. The higher conductivity of the skull tissue in children, different white and gray matter content and CSF volume as well as smaller brain-scalp distance in children may increase transmission of current from the scalp to brain (Beauchamp et al, 2011;Datta et al, 2011Datta et al, , 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculation of these distances was performed in three dimensions using the outer skin and cortical surface meshes. The distance from slice views in two dimensions would result in overestimation of the skin-to-cortex distance, since a closer distance could be found out-of-plane [61]. Therefore, for each node on the tessellated skin surface, we searched for the intersection along the direction of the surface normal at that node and the cortical surface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%