2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40517-019-0139-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development study of Karaha–Talaga Bodas geothermal field using numerical simulation

Abstract: Background The Karaha-Talaga Bodas (K-TB) geothermal field was declared commercially operated in April 2018 with a capacity of 30 MW. This geothermal field is located on a ridge trending north-south to the north of Mount Galunggung, West Java, Indonesia (Fig. 1). The first exploration program of the K-TB geothermal field was conducted in December 1994 by Karaha Bodas Company (KBC). Nineteen shallow-slim and twelve full-sized wells had been drilled by 1998, and by 2010, 14 total full-sized wells had been drille… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural state geothermal reservoir models describe the subsurface temperature and pressure distribution, the location and depth of boiling zones, and the rates of heat and mass transport prior to the onset of exploitation (M. O’Sullivan et al., 2001; M. O’Sullivan & O’Sullivan, 2016). As the subsurface dynamics of fluid flow and heat transfer control the sustainable level of power generation that a geothermal system can support, the natural state models serve as the basis for numerical models calibrated using production history data that evaluate the future response of the system to production (Arellano et al., 2011; Bodvarsson et al., 1987; G. Björnsson et al., 2003; Gunnarsson et al., 2010; Romagnoli et al., 2010; J. O’Sullivan et al., 2015; Ratouis et al., 2016; Rop et al., 2018; Sutopo et al., 2019). Even in geothermal systems such as Krafla that have been exploited for several decades, there is a paucity of data needed to fully constrain the system structure, and the uncertainty of natural state models is significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural state geothermal reservoir models describe the subsurface temperature and pressure distribution, the location and depth of boiling zones, and the rates of heat and mass transport prior to the onset of exploitation (M. O’Sullivan et al., 2001; M. O’Sullivan & O’Sullivan, 2016). As the subsurface dynamics of fluid flow and heat transfer control the sustainable level of power generation that a geothermal system can support, the natural state models serve as the basis for numerical models calibrated using production history data that evaluate the future response of the system to production (Arellano et al., 2011; Bodvarsson et al., 1987; G. Björnsson et al., 2003; Gunnarsson et al., 2010; Romagnoli et al., 2010; J. O’Sullivan et al., 2015; Ratouis et al., 2016; Rop et al., 2018; Sutopo et al., 2019). Even in geothermal systems such as Krafla that have been exploited for several decades, there is a paucity of data needed to fully constrain the system structure, and the uncertainty of natural state models is significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has a value at that stage, but this method may be best for checking for consistency or updating the conceptual model. This method has applied in Arjuno-Welirang [3], Atadei [4][5][6][7], Patuha [8][9][10][11], Cisolok-Cisukarame [12], Kerinci [13], Tompaso [14,15], 1031 (2022) 012021 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1031/1/012021 2 Ulumbu [16][17][18], Mataloko [19,20], Karaha-Talaga Bodas [21][22][23], Songa-Wayaua [24], Danau Ranau [25,26], Lumut Balai [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%