1991
DOI: 10.1021/ci00002a004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of versions 3 and 4 of the Cambridge Structural Database System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

72
740
2
11

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,367 publications
(830 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
72
740
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The atomic coordinates of C7ADP and C8ADP, as well as UiJU~.q, are given in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. The relevant atomic distances and angles are listed in Tables 5 and 6.t The geometric features of the dihydrogen phosphates compared with the structures with R < 0.05 found in the ICSD (ICSD, 1990;Bergerhoff, Hundt, Sievers & Brown, 1983) and the CSD (Cambridge Structural Database, 1995;Allen, Davies, Galloy, Johnson, Kennard, Macrae, Mitchell, Mitchell, Smith & Watson, 1991) are normal. The corresponding interatomic distances of the crystallographically independent molecules are in accordance with C7ADP as well as in C8ADP (see also Tables 5 and 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atomic coordinates of C7ADP and C8ADP, as well as UiJU~.q, are given in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. The relevant atomic distances and angles are listed in Tables 5 and 6.t The geometric features of the dihydrogen phosphates compared with the structures with R < 0.05 found in the ICSD (ICSD, 1990;Bergerhoff, Hundt, Sievers & Brown, 1983) and the CSD (Cambridge Structural Database, 1995;Allen, Davies, Galloy, Johnson, Kennard, Macrae, Mitchell, Mitchell, Smith & Watson, 1991) are normal. The corresponding interatomic distances of the crystallographically independent molecules are in accordance with C7ADP as well as in C8ADP (see also Tables 5 and 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the two most cited articles in the history of JCICS (Warr, 2005) come into this category, these being the standard references for the database searching systems used by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (Allen et al, 1991) and by the Daresbury Chemical Database Service (Fletcher et al, 1996); both of these pre-date our 1998 starting point and are not included in Table 4 only because they have insufficient citations in the period 1998-2006. Review articles -denoted by "(R)" in Table 4 often attract large numbers of citations, e.g., from the introductory sections of subsequent papers, and there are two reviews here -those by Willett et al (1998) and by Taylor et al (2002). Of the remaining 12 articles in the table, no less than four discuss the characteristics that differentiate drugs from other, non-drug molecules (Oprea et al, 2001;Hann et al, 20001;Oprea, 2000;Gillet et al, 1998), and there are two on the calculation of binding energies (i.e., the strength with which a drug molecule attaches itself to a biological receptor) (Bohm, 1998;Wang et al, 2002).…”
Section: The Core Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 The initial partial charges for the solute were computed from the crystal geometry. In a typical simulation, the methyl glycoside was solvated by 270 TIP3P water molecules in a theoretical box with approximate dimensions 23 × 23 × 20 Å.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%