2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2014.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of unfired clay building material using Brick Dust Waste and Mercia mudstone clay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Oti et al [46] The results also showed that the water absorption rate for all the mixtures was extremely low. The results also showed that up to the age of 120 days, the strength of the CSEBs stabilised with cement alone was higher than that stabilised with cement and lime.…”
Section: Production Of Clay-based Construction Materials Through Blenmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Oti et al [46] The results also showed that the water absorption rate for all the mixtures was extremely low. The results also showed that up to the age of 120 days, the strength of the CSEBs stabilised with cement alone was higher than that stabilised with cement and lime.…”
Section: Production Of Clay-based Construction Materials Through Blenmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…According to the reviewed studies and amongst the variety of stabilizers utilised, cement and lime have been the most popular stabilizers in the production of stabilised clay-based construction materials. Cement and/or lime were used either alone [37][38][39][42][43][44], in combination with each other [35,36] or in combination with other stabilisers such as GGBS or PFA [45][46][47]. However, two of the reviewed studies were used different stabilisers such as calcium carbide residue with rice husk ash [40] and magnesium oxide rich kiln dust [41].…”
Section: Critical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations