1935
DOI: 10.1084/jem.61.2.247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development of Pure Cultures of Fibroblasts From Single Mononuclear Cells

Abstract: 1. Most isolated guinea pig mononuclear exudative cells in tissue culture become typical migrating macrophages, but a small proportion take on fibroblastic characteristics, and produce pure colonies of fibroblasts. These fibroblasts maintain their morphological characteristics through repeated subcultures. 2. It is suggested that the subsequent development of individual mononuclear cells in tissue culture is conditioned at the time of explantation. 3. Apposition with other cells i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1942
1942
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The source of the fibroblast in healing wounds The source of the connective tissue-forming cell in healing wounds has been a matter for debate since Cohnheim ( I 867) suggested that cells from the blood may serve as progenitors for fibroblasts. This same notion has since been proposed by many investigators (Fischer, 1925 ;Maximow, 1927;Carrel & Ebeling, 1926;Bloom, 1927; 1928; Moen, 1935;Allgower, 1956; Allgower & Hulliger, 1960; Petrakis, Davis & Lucia, 1961; Petrakis, 1961). Most attempts to study this problem have utilized modifications of various techniques of tissue culture, or examination of blood cells, usually obtained from the buffy coat, grown in subcutaneously implanted Millipore filter diffusion chambers.…”
Section: The Proliferative Phasementioning
confidence: 80%
“…The source of the fibroblast in healing wounds The source of the connective tissue-forming cell in healing wounds has been a matter for debate since Cohnheim ( I 867) suggested that cells from the blood may serve as progenitors for fibroblasts. This same notion has since been proposed by many investigators (Fischer, 1925 ;Maximow, 1927;Carrel & Ebeling, 1926;Bloom, 1927; 1928; Moen, 1935;Allgower, 1956; Allgower & Hulliger, 1960; Petrakis, Davis & Lucia, 1961; Petrakis, 1961). Most attempts to study this problem have utilized modifications of various techniques of tissue culture, or examination of blood cells, usually obtained from the buffy coat, grown in subcutaneously implanted Millipore filter diffusion chambers.…”
Section: The Proliferative Phasementioning
confidence: 80%
“…It was thought that wound fibroblasts were derived from circulating blood cells rather than local tissue stroma. Cultures of buffy coat preparations from blood or bone marrow suggested that circulating cells could differentiate into fibroblasts or other mesenchymal cells 85,86. This hypothesis was rejected by Ross and Lillywhite87 who concluded that the ability to grow fibroblast‐like cells from buffy coat preparations depended on how the blood was collected.…”
Section: Do Myofibroblasts Originate From Circulating Stem Cells?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultures of buffy coat preparations from blood or bone marrow suggested that circulating cells could differentiate into fibroblasts or other mesenchymal cells. 85,86 This hypothesis was rejected by Ross and Lillywhite 87 who concluded that the ability to grow fibroblast-like cells from buffy coat preparations depended on how the blood was collected. Blood collection by arterial catheterization resulted in few, if any, fibroblasts from the circulating cells compared to blood obtained by cardiac puncture.…”
Section: Do Myofibroblasts Originate From Circulating Stem Cells?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not difficult to visualize how some environmental conditions, such as the source of dialyzed serum, may influence the outcome of this delicate balance. The concept of cellular interdependence is well known among the developmental biologists (28), tissue culture investigators (29), and bacteriologists (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%