Cohesion and Dissolution 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-04360-5_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development of Punk and Hardcore in Buenos Aires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expanding on Anderson's considerations of shared imagining, philosopher Charles Taylor (2004: 23) introduced the idea of the social imaginary, which he defines as the “the way ordinary people ‘imagine’ their social surroundings.” This social imaginary is “not expressed in theoretical terms, but is carried in images, stories, and legends” (Taylor, 2004: 55). Even though neither Anderson nor Taylor developed a comprehensive theory of imagination nor engaged with existing studies on imagination, both concepts proved to be very influential in anthropology (Freeman, 2019; Rohrer, 2014). We agree with Stankiewicz’ concern (2016) that the social imaginary could be used as a hollow concept in place of other diluted terminology such as “culture” or “cultural belief” (compare to Strauss, 2006: 322).…”
Section: Dualitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expanding on Anderson's considerations of shared imagining, philosopher Charles Taylor (2004: 23) introduced the idea of the social imaginary, which he defines as the “the way ordinary people ‘imagine’ their social surroundings.” This social imaginary is “not expressed in theoretical terms, but is carried in images, stories, and legends” (Taylor, 2004: 55). Even though neither Anderson nor Taylor developed a comprehensive theory of imagination nor engaged with existing studies on imagination, both concepts proved to be very influential in anthropology (Freeman, 2019; Rohrer, 2014). We agree with Stankiewicz’ concern (2016) that the social imaginary could be used as a hollow concept in place of other diluted terminology such as “culture” or “cultural belief” (compare to Strauss, 2006: 322).…”
Section: Dualitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%