2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of pulmonary aspergillosis and its histologic, clinical, and radiologic manifestations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hemoptysis, which is common in pulmonary aspergillosis and lung cancer, is rare in cryptococcosis. Nodules, especially small nodules adjacent to the pleura are common radiographic manifestation [23], while cavitary lesions are less frequent compared with that in pulmonary aspergillosis [24]. Serum CrAg is a useful predictor for cryptococcal infection [25] 38.2% of CM in lupus patients was misdiagnosed as non-fungal infection or active disease and the case-fatality rate was as high as 23.6% [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hemoptysis, which is common in pulmonary aspergillosis and lung cancer, is rare in cryptococcosis. Nodules, especially small nodules adjacent to the pleura are common radiographic manifestation [23], while cavitary lesions are less frequent compared with that in pulmonary aspergillosis [24]. Serum CrAg is a useful predictor for cryptococcal infection [25] 38.2% of CM in lupus patients was misdiagnosed as non-fungal infection or active disease and the case-fatality rate was as high as 23.6% [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hemoptysis, which was common in pulmonary aspergillosis and lung cancer, was rare in cryptococcosis. Nodules, especially small nodules adjacent to the pleura were common radiographic manifestation [20], while cavitary lesions were less frequent compared to that in pulmonary aspergillosis [21]. Serum CrAg was a useful predictor for cryptococcal infection [22], and PAS-staining was a productive method to distinguish Cryptococcus spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiological features for differential diagnosis: ground-glass opacities and crazy paving pattern are not typical and do not precede consolidations, which frequently present a surrounding ground-glass halo (halo sign) [ 29 ] (Fig. 2 f); in case of consolidations with no ground-glass halo and absence of other ground-glass opacities, COVID-19 pneumonia is unlikely; presence of air crescent sign [ 13 , 27 , 29 ] (Fig. 2 g); lymphadenomegalies and pleural effusions [ 29 ].…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%