2017
DOI: 10.1111/desc.12607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of morphological representations in young readers: a cross‐modal priming study

Abstract: The way children organize words in their memory has intrigued many researchers in the past 20 years. Given the large number of morphologically complex words in many languages, the influence of morphemes on this organization is being increasingly examined. The aim of this study was to understand how morphemic information influences English-speaking children's word recognition. Children in grades 3 and 5 were asked to complete a lexical decision priming task. Prime-target pairs varied in semantic similarity, wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The graded approach to morphology fits well with models of the lexicon in which words form a network based on overlapping semantic, orthographic, and phonological features. This model has been articulated in considerable detail by Bybee (, , ) and Eddington (, ), but is also consistent with the connectionist approach described by Seidenberg and Gonnerman (), and the distributed account in Quémart, Gonnerman, Downing, and Deacon (). The central premise is that morphologically complex words are stored in the lexicon, forming a set of connections based on shared phonology and semantics.…”
Section: Morphological Structuresupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The graded approach to morphology fits well with models of the lexicon in which words form a network based on overlapping semantic, orthographic, and phonological features. This model has been articulated in considerable detail by Bybee (, , ) and Eddington (, ), but is also consistent with the connectionist approach described by Seidenberg and Gonnerman (), and the distributed account in Quémart, Gonnerman, Downing, and Deacon (). The central premise is that morphologically complex words are stored in the lexicon, forming a set of connections based on shared phonology and semantics.…”
Section: Morphological Structuresupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The studies report robust facilitation for words but varying results for nonwords. Hasenäcker, Beyersmann and Schröder (2020) also observe this tendency and suggest that morphological segmentation is affected not only by morphological structure but additionally by the words' full‐form semantic properties (Quémart, Gonnerman, Downing, & Deacon, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Later processing of morphemes incorporates semantic information – morpho‐semantic processing (Rastle & Davis, 2008). A point of debate lies in whether children's fast segmentation of morphologically complex words incorporates semantic information (Beyersmann et al, 2012) or not (Quémart, Casalis, & Colé, 2011) or is best explained by graded convergence of both codes (Quémart, Gonnerman, Downing, & Deacon, 2018). Developmental changes in the time course of these processes might also be at play.…”
Section: The Role Of Morphology In Theories Of Word Reading and Spellingmentioning
confidence: 99%