2021
DOI: 10.3390/su132212883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development of Major Seaports in the Context of National Maritime Policy. The Case Study of Poland

Abstract: State authorities may influence the development of seaports by employing the tools of national maritime policy. On the one hand, seaports contribute to the socioeconomic development of coastal regions; on the other, they have a significant impact on foreign trade turnover. The aim of this study is to identify the major factors that have influenced the development of Poland’s seaports in the context of the country’s maritime policy. The paper examines and explains the development and transitions of major Polish… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, the ports of Gdańsk and Gdynia achieve by far the worst results, as they should implement as many as seven environmental initiatives of the port's SD, including those that require significant infrastructure investments. Our results contradict Bocheński et al (2021), who stated that those ports created “opportunities for the use of alternative fuels by ships, electricity supply from shore to vessels at berth, and reduction of emissions from storage yards” (sic). As for the other ports from this group, only the Port of Klaipeda does not use technology that requires less energy, while all still struggle to comply with EU legislation regarding emissions reduction at berths (e.g., the introduction of LNG bunkering, OPS, or RES).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the ports of Gdańsk and Gdynia achieve by far the worst results, as they should implement as many as seven environmental initiatives of the port's SD, including those that require significant infrastructure investments. Our results contradict Bocheński et al (2021), who stated that those ports created “opportunities for the use of alternative fuels by ships, electricity supply from shore to vessels at berth, and reduction of emissions from storage yards” (sic). As for the other ports from this group, only the Port of Klaipeda does not use technology that requires less energy, while all still struggle to comply with EU legislation regarding emissions reduction at berths (e.g., the introduction of LNG bunkering, OPS, or RES).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In the Global context, regardless of seaports being the main hub for economic development of some countries especially non landlocked countries, effective seaports transportation activities are hampered by external environments. These includes political changes, great geographical discoveries, wars and colonial expansion of European countries, economic development, social crisis and industrial revolution (Montwill, 2014;Bocheński et al, 2021). Other authors, including Notteboom et al (2022) and Olukoju (2020) consider seaport as an important economic space in which a wide range of services play roles to a wide range of customers such as shippers, forwarders, transport companies and logistics.…”
Section: East African Journal Of Education and Social Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving access to seaports and border crossings (in the East) as generators of the main traffic of international transport [64,157]. 6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%