The development of internet financial reporting publications: A concise of bibliometric analysis

Abstract

This paper identifies the main areas and the development of the field of internet financial reporting publications and to suggest future research directions. Internet use for corporate financial reporting represents a voluntary approach to consolidate printed sustainability reports which have increasingly been published by large companies in recent years. Using a bibliometric analysis, this paper examined a sample of 246 studies from Web of Science, Scopus, Emerald, Springer, Proquest, Ebsco, and Science Direct databases and only accepted articles and review paper were published in open access to identify research activity on internet financial reporting between 1998 until 2020. This review provides the most influential articles and authors based on their citations and publications as well as their importance within the network through network visualization, overlay visualization, and density visualization. The co-authorship analysis shows 208 authors who have connected each other, the co-organization analysis resulted 76 organizations which write article about internet financial reporting and co-occurrence analysis of keywords, the results found that 669 keywords divided into 11 clusters. The analysis which uses bibliometric analysis develops the status of internet financial reporting, this is a research field in a precise way through the visualization of emerging trend and currently focused on topics. The results of analysis also have recommended some variables which can be used in further research, and it is very helpful to find knowledge basis and detect the future research directions in this area.

Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility: A bibliometric analysis

“…For example, in the study by Frias-Aceituno et al [ 68 ]; García-Sánchez, who was the third author, found that the board has a role in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting. This finding is consistent with other bibliometric analyses on board and CSR or sustainability reporting [ 20 ]. These findings imply that more studies are needed for a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between BGD and CSR.…”

“…It has recently become more popular in the discipline of Management (e.g. [ 20 , 21 , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] ]). Moreover, it has also been employed to map CSR-related research [ 9 , 19 ].…”

“…Therefore, this study intends to conduct comprehensive bibliometric review of BGD and CSR literature. The purpose of a bibliometric review is to identify the most influential authors, articles, journals, and themes across various countries, institutions, and topics with respect to a particular body of knowledge [ [20] , [21] , [22] ]. To formulate and review the intellectual structure of the extant literature concerning BGD and CSR, this study aims to incorporate several bibliometric analyses relating to the related keywords, and the most productive authors, articles, journals, research sponsors, and countries.…”

Bibliometric Analysis of Granger Causality Studies

“…The colour of the node and line represent the year of the documents contained the keywords were published. A lighter colour of the node and line show the recent focus of keywords in Granger causality [ 137 ]. The recent research in Granger causality focused on renewable energy, non-renewable energy, trade openness, carbon emissions, ARDL, EKC, and globalization.…”

Understanding the dynamics and conceptualization of environmental citizenship and energy citizenship: Evidence from the existing literature

“…Bibliometric analysis is a method based on statistical data used to measure the impacts of parameters such as scientific publications, authors, institutions, scientists, and keywords (Biresselioglu et al, 2020). An analysis of publications related to a given research discipline is known as bibliometric analysis, and it is commonly used to assess knowledge structure and development in Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, and Humanities (Pauna et al, 2019;Xie et al, 2020;Katoch, 2021;Murdayanti and Khan, 2021;Mörschbächer and Granada, 2022).…”