The Development of Indicators for Transformational Leadership of Undergraduate Students at Thailand National Sports University

Abstract

This paper develops indicators for transformational leadership of undergraduate students at Thailand National Sports University. The development of these indicators was based on in-depth interviews with six informants. The research instrument was a semi-structured interview form. The data collected were inductively analyzed. The development of indicators was accomplished through the synthesis of the data and the conceptual framework for this research investigation. Evaluate indicators of Accuracy Standard Propriety Standard with of five experts was compared with the principle of 3.50, using the research instrument was an Evaluation Form and thence the verification of the quality of the congruence of the indicators. The sample population consisted of 4 5 0 undergraduate students at Thailand National Sports. The research instrument was a rating-scale questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was utilized in conjunction with reliance on the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) technique. Findings were as follows: 1) In regard to the development of indicators for transformational leadership of undergraduate students at Thailand National Sports University, results were as follows: The aspect of idealized influence engendered eight keywords and twenty-two subtopics. The aspect of inspiration motivation exhibited six keywords and thirteen subtopics. The aspect of intellectual motivation evinced six keywords and fourteen subtopics. The aspect of individualized consideration displayed five keywords and eleven subtopics. 2) Assessing indicators for transformational leadership of undergraduate students at Thailand National Sports University All aspects were significantly higher than the threshold 3.50 at the .05 level. 3) The development of indicators for transformational leadership of undergraduate students at Thailand National Sports University were found to have twenty-five indicators. The verification of the quality of appropriateness for the indicators for transformational leadership of undergraduate students at Thailand National Sports University showed that chi-square (χ2) was at 552.93; (probability-value [p-value] at 0.000); degrees of freedom (df) at 271; relative χ2 at 2.04; goodness of fit index (GFI) at 0.91; adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) at 0.90; Normal Fit Index (NFI) at 0.99; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) at 0.99 and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) at 0.04. It is concluded that transformational leadership of undergraduate students at Thailand National Sports is consistent with empirical data.

The Development of a Pre-Service Teachers Model in Educational Institutions for Students in the Field of Physical Education, Faculty of Education, a Four-Year Program

“…However, it has been determined that pre-service teachers did not have an idea about technology and technological developments in the Industrial Age 4.0 (Bolat & Baş, 2018). This result is consistent with Sukdee (2021), who showed that students should have transformational leadership consisting of idealized influence, inspiration motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration to prepare for economic changes in society and technology.…”

Una revisión de la investigación empírica sobre liderazgo transformacional en universitarios (2014-2023)

“…Otras variables encontradas son el Empoderamiento psicológico (Amjad et al, 2022;Fauzi et al, 2021), Comportamiento emprendedor/Perfil del emprendedor (Álava-Atiencie & Quinde-Lituma, 2023;Fauzi et al, 2021), Habilidades sociales/competencias socioemocionales (Álamo & Falla, 2022;Tenorio, 2021) y Personalidad (Lamm et al, 2014;Perreault et al, 2016). Por último, se hallan variables poco estudiadas como Identidad global y local (Lisak & Harush, 2021), Apoyo a las necesidades psicológicas (Perreault et al, 2016), Estrategias de intercambio de conocimiento (Fauzi et al, 2021), Motivación del estudiante (Lee et al, 2022) y la Elaboración de indicadores de LT (Sukdee, 2021), que es un estudio instrumental.…”

“…Además, dentro de los instrumentos psicométricos hallamos a la Encuesta de Orientaciones de Liderazgo de Bolman y Deal (1990, en Devecioğlu, 2018, Liderazgo Transformacional Global (GTL) de Carless et al (2000, en Perreault et al, 2016, la Encuesta de Liderazgo Transformacional (TLS) de Clark (2011;Amjad et al, 2022), Escala de Liderazgo transformacional validado por Rafferty & Griffin (2004, en Salanova et al, 2022 y la Escala MLIS de Cárdenas (2016, en Tenorio, 2021) de origen peruano con 4,76% (1 artículo) en cada caso. Por otro lado, se aprecia un Cuestionario de indicadores de LT, el cual fue elaborado por Sukdee (2021). Por último, se puede apreciar en la Tabla 2 que se elaboraron otras herramientas o estrategias para medir el liderazgo transformacional como Pruebas de conocimiento (Pascal et al, 2017) y Análisis de ensayos (Lee et al, 2022).…”