2023
DOI: 10.1063/5.0125874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of high order thinking skills (HOTS) wave test instrument for high school students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Content validity ensures that the instrument effectively covers relevant subject matter, and construct validity shows that the instrument is capable of measuring the Higher-Order Thinking abilities of students related to work and energy in high school physics (Zhou et al, 2023). This affirms that the HOT evaluation instrument aligns with the measurement objectives and possesses strong validity (Masturi et al, 2023).…”
Section: Figure 1 Expert Validation Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Content validity ensures that the instrument effectively covers relevant subject matter, and construct validity shows that the instrument is capable of measuring the Higher-Order Thinking abilities of students related to work and energy in high school physics (Zhou et al, 2023). This affirms that the HOT evaluation instrument aligns with the measurement objectives and possesses strong validity (Masturi et al, 2023).…”
Section: Figure 1 Expert Validation Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The results of the construct validity analysis indicate that the HOT evaluation instrument can effectively measure the Higher-Order Thinking abilities of students related to the work and energy topics in high school physics. This is supported by factor analysis indicating that the test items in this instrument contribute to measuring Higher-Order Thinking skills (Masturi et al, 2023). In conclusion, the HOT evaluation instrument developed has successfully passed content and construct validity analyses with positive results.…”
Section: Figure 1 Expert Validation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%