The development of employee ownership in China

Abstract

Purpose Little systematic work has been completed on the incidence of employee ownership in a Chinese context. Similar to the situation in Eastern Europe, this type of ownership was quite widespread in China, particularly during the 1990s. Based on the existing literature and available statistical data, the purpose of this paper is to identify drivers of, and barriers to, the development of employee ownership in China. Design/methodology/approach The scattered evidence from the literature and official statistical sources are collected and structured in a systematic analysis where the drivers and barriers for employee ownership in the transition process from plan to market are identified at three levels: society, the company and the individual. Findings Employee ownership developed as a transitory stage between state and private ownership; employees acquired ownership stakes as part of the privatisation of small- and medium-sized state-owned enterprises as well as collectively owned enterprises. However, in most cases the dynamics of ownership resulted in dominant ownership by managers. This trend became more noticeable at later stages of the privatisation process. Research limitations/implications The paper shows how policies and institutional settings at the society level are determining for the development of employee ownership. Originality/value The contribution of the paper is to give a general and systematic analysis of the development of employee ownership in China both based on a comprehensive literature review and by utilising existing statistical sources.

Employee ownership in China: new evidence

“…Literature summary 1 Company size measured by staff number Kruse (1996), Pendleton (1997Pendleton ( , 2006, Festing et al (1999), Jones (2004), Meng et al (2011), Kim et al (2014), Fang et al (2015), Guery and Pendleton (2016), Jaakson and Kallaste (2016), Torp (2014), Guery and Guery (2017), Poutsma and Ligthart (2017), Mygind and Faigen (2017) Sector Kruse (1996), Pendleton (1997Pendleton ( , 2006, Kim et al (2014), Torp (2014), Jaakson and Kallaste (2016), Guery and Pendleton (2016), Guery and Guery (2017) Kruse (1996), Pendleton (1997Pendleton ( , 2006, Kim et al (2014), Guery and Pendleton (2016), Pendleton and Robinson (2016), Guery and Guery (2017), Poutsma and Ligthart (2017) 24 Performance (measured by productivity) Pendleton (1997)…”

The economics of Participation and Employee Ownership (PEO): an assessment

“…For many countries such as India and most of Latin America it appears that we know next to nothing about the scope and extent of nearly all forms of PEO. While there is an awareness of the incidence of some forms, including EO in China (see Mygind and Faigen, 2017) and WCs in Uruguay (e.g. Burdin and Dean, 2009), in the main the empirical base for developing economies and emerging markets economies is quite slim.…”