The development of employee financial participation in Estonia

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the development of employee financial participation in Estonia from patterns of employee ownership which was promoted during the privatization of enterprises in the transition period, to the emergence of different forms of employee participation, including employee share ownership and profit sharing schemes. The analysis of the changing institutional setting and legislation in Estonia in the context of EU accession serves as a basis for examining the actual diversification of forms of employee financial participation, and provides some suggestions of likely further development. Design/methodology/approach -The study combines results from earlier research, analysis of Estonian legislation from the late 1980s to the present time, interviews with social partners, data collected through enterprise surveys during the transition period and case studies, examining recent examples of financial participation. Findings -There is no historical tradition of employee financial participation in Estonia. By far the most important development was in relation to early privatization, with the employee takeover of many small enterprises. However, majority ownership by employees in these firms has changed quite rapidly, so that now the dominant ownership pattern is of ownership by managers and outside owners. This phenomenon was observed both in quantitative studies and in case studies. There are very few cases of profit sharing. The need to transform acquis communautaire into national law in connection with the EU accession has recently led to debates about employee participation in decision making. Although the government and other influential political players do not promote financial participation, the discussion on the implementation of EU directives shows that the issue will be addressed and even new legislation could be adopted if an EU act on financial participation of employees were approved. Research limitations/implications -In contrast with employee share ownership, the incidence of which was quite recently assessed in a survey study of January 2005 for 722 enterprises, profit sharing has not been the subject of regular and/or recent studies. Thus, one should be cautious when estimating the extent of the spread of diverse forms of financial participation in Estonian companies. Practical implications -Description of the current status of employee financial participation can be important for policy makers for further development of the labour market in Estonia. Development of legislation following the trend in the EU, together with changes in the taxation system, could promote different forms of financial participation by employees, and could lead to strengthening employee motivation and productivity, especially in knowledge-based companies. Originality/value -The paper is a comprehensive description of the development and current status of employee financial participation in Estonia. The paper provides suggestions for further research.

The Advantages of Budgets: A Survey of Macedonian Legal Entities

“…Hence, the field scan clearly indicates that behavioral issues are in fact the most common cause for dissatisfaction with the budgeting process, which confirms the third research hypothesis. This conclusion is in line with the results reported by Boon, Arumugam, Safa, and Baker (2007), George and Weimerskirch (1998), Bou and Beltrá n (2005), and Eamets, Mygind, and Natalia (2008). Aside from these two behavioral hurdles, the survey respondents that promote change state that there is a need to reduce the planning process duration (M=4.6) and to emphasize long-term direction given the predominant focus of budgeting on short-term results (M=4.0).…”

“…Moreover, budgeting produces dysfunctional behavior, especially when performance measurement targets are unrealistic. In their research, George and Weimerskirch (1998), Bou and Beltrá n (2005), and Eamets, Mygind, and Natalia (2008) say that the behavioral component of budgeting means engaging people to fulfil its technical aspect. Therefore, companies must be well aware that the effective application of any budget rests on employee commitment to the objectives and budget of their company.…”

A content and comparative analysis of strategic management research in the Baltic area

“…And second, research on SM in the Baltic area is similar to research published regardless of the location studied. Examples of articles focussing mainly in the corporate level strategy are those of Lorentz, Hakkinen and Hilmola (2006), who studied cross-border merger and acquisition strategies in the retail sector of Russia, or Eamets et al (2008), who advanced on the differences at the corporate level due to the financial participation of employees in ownership by using a mixed method. Lemmetyinen and Go (2010) examine the process of building a brand identity in the cruise sector based in the Baltic Sea region.…”

New social cooperation model in service oriented economy: the case of employee financial participation in the Baltic states

“…The current topics in financial employee participation research are related to the studies of organisational effects and institutional settings (Jaakson & Kallaste, 2014;Eamets et al, 2008;Rimas, 2009), the historical tradition based on negative effects of post-Soviet privatisation (Eamets et al, 2008), influence of employee motivation on productivity improvement (Berķe-Berga, 2014) or search for the "best fit" model of employee ownership (Berķe-Berga, 2013). Lawyers and consultants have published some informative articles about financial employee participation schemes with the focus on possible motivational effects that can be achieved.…”

“…Lawyers and consultants have published some informative articles about financial employee participation schemes with the focus on possible motivational effects that can be achieved. It must be emphasised that the Baltic states have a very low occurrence of employee financial participation as well as little support (Eamets, 2008;Mygind, 2012;Jaakson, 2014;Berke-Berga, 2013). Up to now, employee financial participation has been regulated to a very low extent in the Baltic states (Lowitzsch, 2009a).…”