The Development of Cooperation in the Digital Economy Based on Scientific Research by A. V. Chayanov

Глущенко, Т Е; Khodarinova, Nina V.; Ищенко, О. В.; Shaposhnikov, V. L.; Aksenova, Zhanna A.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57831-2_5

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The descriptive statistical analysis results of the data are shown in Table 4. In fact, compared with the development of digital industry, it is easier and more effective to carry out digital infrastructure and application of digital technology, such as the construction of mobile signal base station and the promotion of online payment [15][16][17]. Although only developing these aspects can also promote the development of digital economy, it may produce a large amount of low-level repetitive investment, which is not conducive to the sustainable development of digital economy.…”

Section: Data Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Digital Economy Development Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method

Yang

2022

Journal of Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At present, China’s economic development is in a critical period of transformation, which needs to get rid of the dependence on the real estate industry and low-end export processing industry, and is in urgent need of new growth engines. The emergence of the digital economy has provided a boost to economic upgrading, but to give full play to the potential of the digital economy, we must have an accurate and full understanding of it. At present, the development of digital economy has become the focus of all circles. Digital economy is a multilevel and complex concept, so this paper establishes a multi-index comprehensive evaluation system and uses AHP-entropy weight method to measure the development level of China’s digital economy and, on this basis, analyzes the development level, dynamic changes, and regional differences of China’s digital economy. The results show that China’s digital economy is on the rise, which is mainly driven by the construction of digital infrastructure and the application of digital technology. By region, there is a big gap between different regions in the development of digital economy, and this gap is expanding continuously. The digital economy in the eastern region is in a leading position, but only in the development of the digital industry.

show abstract

Section: Data Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Digital Economy Development Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method

Yang

2022

Journal of Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Third, digital transformation and new space technologies (Weinzierl, 2018) are transforming the face of agriculture, offering interesting opportunities for sustainable innovation with the advent of smart farming or agriculture 4.0, creating an innovative kind of digital peasantry (Klerkx et al , 2019). The linkages between digitization and the peasantry are widely discussed in the recent literature (Glushchenko et al , 2021; Prause et al , 2021; Turchaeva and Golovach, 2021). Fourth, the separate development of traditional farming and smart farming imposes a dualistic bifurcation representing different structures of ownership existing in different parts of the world.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The paradox of the peasantry in management and organization studies

Cunha

Clegg

Rego

et al. 2021

IJOA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Burrell (2020) challenged management and organization studies (MOS) scholars to pay attention to a topic they have mostly ignored: the peasantry, those 2 billion people that work in the rural primary sector. This paper aims to address the topic to expand Burrell’s challenge by indicating that the peasantry offers a unique context to study a paradoxical condition: the coexistence of persistent poverty and vanguardist innovation. Design/methodology/approach The authors advance conceptual arguments that complement the reasons why researchers should pay more attention to the peasantry. They argue that continuation of past research into field laborers, transitioning from feudalism to industrial capitalism, still has currency, not just because of the good reasons listed by Burrell (enduring relevance of the phenomenon in developing countries; sustainability concerns; acknowledgment of common heritage) but also because some seemingly archaic practices are evident in the economically developed countries where most management and organizations scholars live. Findings The authors show that in advanced economies, the peasantry has not disappeared, and it is manifested in contradictory forms, as positive force contributing to sustainable productivity (in the case of digitized agriculture) and as a negative legacy of social inequality and exploitation (as a form of modern slavery). Originality/value The authors discuss contrasting themes confronting management of the peasantry, namely, modern slavery and digital farming, and propose that a paradox view may help overcome unnecessary dualisms, which may promote social exclusion rather than integrated development.

show abstract

Chayanov: The Reception of an Early Soviet Agricultural Economist

Leonard¹

2022

Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Development of Cooperation in the Digital Economy Based on Scientific Research by A. V. Chayanov

Cited by 3 publications

References 7 publications

Analysis of Digital Economy Development Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method

Analysis of Digital Economy Development Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method

The paradox of the peasantry in management and organization studies

Chayanov: The Reception of an Early Soviet Agricultural Economist

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About