1998
DOI: 10.1080/713755570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development of an Ecologically Valid Test for Assessing Patients with a Dysexecutive Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
204
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
204
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Não foram encontrados estudos de adaptação e validade de conteúdo da BADS para outras línguas, no entanto diversas pesquisas têm demonstrado boa validade concorrente do instrumento na avaliação de diversas populações neurológicas e psiquiátricas (Bennet, Ong, & Ponsford, 2005;Evans, Chua, Mckenna, & Wilson, 1997;Katz et al, 2007;Norris & Tate, 2000;Wilson et al, 1998). Outros estudos têm demonstrado que a BADS possui maior poder discriminativo em predizer alterações executivas na vida diária (Burgess et al, 2000;Chaytor & Schmitter-Edgecombe, 2003;Chamberlain, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Não foram encontrados estudos de adaptação e validade de conteúdo da BADS para outras línguas, no entanto diversas pesquisas têm demonstrado boa validade concorrente do instrumento na avaliação de diversas populações neurológicas e psiquiátricas (Bennet, Ong, & Ponsford, 2005;Evans, Chua, Mckenna, & Wilson, 1997;Katz et al, 2007;Norris & Tate, 2000;Wilson et al, 1998). Outros estudos têm demonstrado que a BADS possui maior poder discriminativo em predizer alterações executivas na vida diária (Burgess et al, 2000;Chaytor & Schmitter-Edgecombe, 2003;Chamberlain, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A estabilidade temporal do BADS foi estudada por Wilson et al 31 , que administraram o instrumento em 29 participantes saudáveis e com intervalo entre teste-reteste de 6 a 12 meses. A correlação teste-reteste variou entre 0,08 (Rule Shift Cards) e 0,71 (Key Search), evidenciando baixa à moderada correlação 19 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Embora outros estudos prévios de fidedignidade de testes que examinam as FE também apresentam uma variação grande entre teste e reteste 31 , salienta-se que uma possível limitação do presente estudo seja a amplitude de intervalo do tempo entre teste e reteste, de um a seis meses. Além disso, a variação da faixa etária da amostra, 19 e 75 anos, também pode ser considerada outra limitação da pesquisa.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…For example, it is not clear if damage to the medial orbital and lower medial prefrontal sectors (the region that we have termed the ventromedial prefrontal cortices, or VMPC; see Tranel, Damasio, Denburg, & Bechara, 2005, for a precise description) is typical of patients who fail the SET and MET. In most previous studies, neuroanatomical issues were not addressed at all (e.g., Alderman et al, 2003;Burgess et al, 1998;Duncan et al, 1997;Jelicic et al, 2001;Kafer & Hunter, 1997;Kliegel et al, 2000;Knight et al, 2002;Wilson et al, 1998). Shallice and Burgess (1991) provided brief descriptions of the lesions in their original three cases, but other than mentioning frontal lobe damage, no specific details are provided, and it is not clear whether or not the VMPC was affected by the lesions (for two of these patients, a single computed tomography, CT, cut is provided in the recent review paper of Burgess et al (2006), but this does not clarify whether there is VMPC involvement).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, these tasks (and various modifications) have been utilized by a number of researchers to investigate executive functioning in normals and various patient populations (e.g., Alderman, Burgess, Knight, & Henman, 2003;Channon & Crawford, 1999;Duncan, Johnson, Swales, & Freer, 1997;Goel & Grafman, 2000;Goldstein, Bernard, Fenwick, Burgess, & McNeil, 1993;Jelicic, Henquet, Derix, & Jolles, 2001;Kafer & Hunter, 1997;Kliegel, McDaniel, & Einstein, 2000;Knight, Alderman, & Burgess, 2002;Levine, Dawson, Boutet, Schwartz, & Stuss, 2000a;Levine et al, in press Levine et al, 1998;Wilson et al, 1998), especially with an eye to rehabilitation planning (e.g., Levine et al, 2000b;Manly, Hawkins, Evans, Woldt, & Robertson, 2002). By now, there are consistent findings supporting the conclusion that these tasks are useful to characterize and quantify executive functioning deficits, and Burgess and his colleagues have made a convincing argument that "strategy application" types of task may be superior to traditional clinical neuropsychological tests (e.g., Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, WCST; Tower of London) at probing "real-world" deficits in executive functioning (Burgess et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%