2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of a tool for assessing the environmental qualities of urban blue spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst some indicators of coastal and beach quality may be transferable to certain freshwater environments, such as large lakes with beaches and shorelines, many are specific to marine settings and are, therefore, inadequate for assessing freshwater blue space quality. Currently, the BlueHealth Environmental Assessment Tool (BEAT) is the only dedicated tool for assessing the quality of coastal and freshwater blue space (Mishra et al, 2020). BEAT uses a questionnaire-based approach to examine physical, social, aesthetic and environmental aspects of blue space, which relate to opportunities for improved health and well-being.…”
Section: Freshwater Blue Space Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst some indicators of coastal and beach quality may be transferable to certain freshwater environments, such as large lakes with beaches and shorelines, many are specific to marine settings and are, therefore, inadequate for assessing freshwater blue space quality. Currently, the BlueHealth Environmental Assessment Tool (BEAT) is the only dedicated tool for assessing the quality of coastal and freshwater blue space (Mishra et al, 2020). BEAT uses a questionnaire-based approach to examine physical, social, aesthetic and environmental aspects of blue space, which relate to opportunities for improved health and well-being.…”
Section: Freshwater Blue Space Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering social aspects of surfing in terms of health benefits, there is literature concerning the therapeutic benefits of blue space [ 69 , 70 ]; yet surfing studies are relatively novel [ 71 , 72 ]. These results support how surfing might challenge complexities around personal identity and social/cultural norms and in particular, hydrophilic place-based “belonging” narratives [ 73 , 74 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the VPM, a second survey would have been useful to complete the impact evaluation cycle. However, due to limited resources, we could not conduct an observational survey to evaluate the actual use of the studied site (e.g., using the SOPARC tool [ 65 ] or others designed by the BlueHealth project [ 66 , 67 ]); this information would also have been valuable for estimating the levels of physical activity and understanding the new activities and social interactions occurring in the Can Moritz spring area. The postintervention survey took place a few weeks before the lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020; this limited the number of people who could participate in the survey, as most did not reply before the lockdown and, therefore, their visits to the site would have been biased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%