2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-01668-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of a return to work intervention programme for stroke survivor (SReTWIP): a Delphi survey

Abstract: Background: Even though clearly defined pathways for vocational re-entry are well recognized for conditions such as mental health, musculoskeletal dysfunction (MSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI), none has been identified for stroke. There has been a lack of consensus regarding such clear pathways to vocational re-entry and the essential contents of return to work (RTW) interventions for stroke survivors. As part of a larger study aimed to design a RTW programme for stroke survivors, this study describes the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Previous researchers focus on patients with stroke who had not returned to work. [24][25][26] This scoping review addressed this knowledge gap by identifying and synthesising the work situation of patients with stroke who have returned to work.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Previous researchers focus on patients with stroke who had not returned to work. [24][25][26] This scoping review addressed this knowledge gap by identifying and synthesising the work situation of patients with stroke who have returned to work.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each disease has a specific course and special requirements that must be taken into account in the context of health care (Gensichen et al., 2006). A continuous or relapsing progression as well as permanent disabilities may accompany affected persons in the further course of their lives, which at the same time requires continuous coping strategies in both private and professional contexts (Norlander et al., 2022; Olaoye et al., 2020; Rimmele & Thomalla, 2022). However, current care structures continue to focus on acute and short-term treatments rather than preventive and long-term interventions (Kuriakose & Xiao, 2020; Norrving et al., 2018; Sachverständigenrat [SVR], 2018; Stumm et al., 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%