2018
DOI: 10.1002/ets2.12234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development of a Quadratic Functions Learning Progression and Associated Task Shells

Abstract: In this report, we discuss background research on the development of student understanding of quadratic functions and present a provisional learning progression for quadratic functions and quadratic equations. We also describe task shells that are linked to the learning progression. The learning progression and task shells can be used as a starting point to develop tasks that assess student standing with respect to the theory of development. The intention is that this report should find an audience in both res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students' difficulty in transforming π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘₯π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯ + 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 = 0 into 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓(π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯) = π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž(π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯ βˆ’ β„Ž) 2 + π‘˜π‘˜π‘˜π‘˜ coincides with the findings of Parent (2015), who asserted that students prefer the standard form of the quadratic equation more than the standard form the vertex form because the learners generally are not used to dealing with graphs and tables. Results also support the evidence that students may have learned the procedural rules in association with transforming the standard form of QE into vertex form or vice versa; however, they may not understand the implications or the mathematical meanings, causing them to have difficulty in distinguishing the different forms (Graf et al, 2018).…”
Section: Learning Difficulties In Algebra During the New Normalsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Students' difficulty in transforming π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘₯π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯ + 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 = 0 into 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓(π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯) = π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž(π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯ βˆ’ β„Ž) 2 + π‘˜π‘˜π‘˜π‘˜ coincides with the findings of Parent (2015), who asserted that students prefer the standard form of the quadratic equation more than the standard form the vertex form because the learners generally are not used to dealing with graphs and tables. Results also support the evidence that students may have learned the procedural rules in association with transforming the standard form of QE into vertex form or vice versa; however, they may not understand the implications or the mathematical meanings, causing them to have difficulty in distinguishing the different forms (Graf et al, 2018).…”
Section: Learning Difficulties In Algebra During the New Normalsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The 3 rd order regression (y = ax 3 + bx 2 + cx + d) also has a turning point which causes the modeling to be biased to achieve its maximum point. Therefore, the multiplication of leaf length and width data in the 2 nd and 3 rd order regression modeling must be limited so that the correlation has no bias and is always positive [15,16,17]. Generally, the higher the order of the regression model, the better the model in data forecasting, as presented in previous research [18].…”
Section: Mathematical Model Designmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since O(n) is more efficient than O(n 2 ), we can see that MSD-Splitting improves the efficiency of the C4.5 algorithm. The improvement in efficiency will be greater for larger data sets due to the quadratic time complexity of the standard C4.5 algorithm's method of finding the ideal split point, which grows at a faster rate as the number of values and possible split points increases [30].…”
Section: Effect On Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Census Income data set is significantly larger than the Heart Disease data set, the difference between the execution time of our initial model and our optimized model is significantly greater for the Census Income data set than for the Heart Disease data set. This is due to the behavior of the previously mentioned quadratic time complexity of our initial model [30]. In order to account for the different sizes of the data sets, we must compare the efficiency of our two models separately for each data set.…”
Section: B Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%