2004
DOI: 10.1179/146531204225022434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of a patient-centered measure of the process and outcome of combined orthodontic and orthognathic treatment

Abstract: A patient-based measure of the process and outcome of combined orthodontic and orthognathic treatment has been developed. This has sufficient validity and reliability for use in inter-center audit projects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only patients who were less than 3 months post-surgery were excluded. The PSQ was modified from a questionnaire developed by Travess et al (2004) and supported by the British Orthodontic Society Foundation for a UK national orthognathic patient satisfaction survey. A 7-point Likert scale (where 1 represented least satisfaction and 7 represented most satisfaction) was used for answering the questions in the PSQ and a pilot study was carried out on five patients to assess its effectiveness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only patients who were less than 3 months post-surgery were excluded. The PSQ was modified from a questionnaire developed by Travess et al (2004) and supported by the British Orthodontic Society Foundation for a UK national orthognathic patient satisfaction survey. A 7-point Likert scale (where 1 represented least satisfaction and 7 represented most satisfaction) was used for answering the questions in the PSQ and a pilot study was carried out on five patients to assess its effectiveness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SESS has been verified to have high reliability and validity through conventional assessment methods (Edward & Richard 1980, Syrjälä et al 1999, Resnick et al 2000, Travess et al 2004, Champion et al 2005, George et al 2007, Rossen & Gruber 2007). Further, reliability has been demonstrated for both internal consistency and test‐retest stability (Kakudate et al 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability and validity of the SESS were preliminarily verified using the conventional method (Carmines and Zeller, 1980; Syrjälä et al , 1999; Resnick et al , 2000; Travess et al , 2004; Champion et al , 2005; George et al , 2007; Rossen and Gruber, 2007). The scale had a previously estimated reliability for both internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86) and test‐retest stability (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient = 0.73; P < 0.001).…”
Section: Development Of the Self‐efficacy Scale For Self‐care (Sess) mentioning
confidence: 99%