2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of a mRNA multiplex RT-PCR assay for the definitive identification of body fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
90
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
90
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, currently no housekeeping gene is described that is suitable for the detection of all tested body fluids. Saliva and semen, for example, show very little or no expression of common housekeeping genes (GAPDH, 18S rRNA, TEF, UCE), presumably because of limited cell metabolism in spermatozoids and the desquamated cells of the cheek mucosa [14,17]. Additionally, the high abundance of housekeeping genes relative to mRNA may result in the titration of critical PCR components thereby affecting the overall sensitivity of the multiplex system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, currently no housekeeping gene is described that is suitable for the detection of all tested body fluids. Saliva and semen, for example, show very little or no expression of common housekeeping genes (GAPDH, 18S rRNA, TEF, UCE), presumably because of limited cell metabolism in spermatozoids and the desquamated cells of the cheek mucosa [14,17]. Additionally, the high abundance of housekeeping genes relative to mRNA may result in the titration of critical PCR components thereby affecting the overall sensitivity of the multiplex system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of mRNA markers have been identified for the forensically most relevant body fluids: blood, saliva, semen, vaginal secretions and menstrual blood [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. RNA is notorious for its rapid post-mortem and in vitro decay, but several reports have pointed out an unexpectedly high stability of RNA in forensic stains [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The expression of these housekeeping genes was additionally tested in blood, saliva and semen dilution series. Several housekeeping gene markers have already been tested on body fluids [19,24,32,37], but up to now, no marker has been described that is universally suitable for all body fluids. Saliva and semen normally show reduced expression of housekeeping genes, probably because spermatozoids contain little cytoplasm and few ribosomes and the desquamated cells of the buccal mucosa have almost no cell metabolism [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without such a determination, the ambiguity of the tissue source of origin can be exploited as alternative circumstances of the crime (e.g., how the body fluid may have been deposited) could be suggested. The bioparticle collection and isolation protocols described here could be used to collect bioparticles or other cells (e.g., buccal, vaginal) for use in a tissue source identification (mRNA profiling [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] ) strategy that involves micro-volume reverse transcription (RT) and amplification reactions. With further optimization it may also be possible to develop a DNA/RNA co-isolation strategy to permit cell type identification (RNA) and STR profiling from the same sample, including bioparticles from touch DNA evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%