The Development of a Measure of Auditors’ Virtue

Abstract

Auditors’ virtue comprises those qualities of character that manifest the ideals of the audit community (c.f., Maclntyre, 1984, After Virtue. (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame)), and are instrumental in ensuring that auditors’ professional judgment is exercised according to a high moral standard (Thorne, 1998, Research on Accounting Ethics. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT)). Nevertheless, the lack of valid and reliable quantitative measures of auditors’ virtue impedes research that furthers our understanding of how best to promote virtue in the audit community. To address this gap, we develop two measures of auditors’ virtue. We report the results of the validity and reliability of the scales. In addition, we use the findings from the administration of these scales to professional accountants to refine and validate the theoretical characterization of virtues developed by Pincoffs (1986, Quandaries and Virtues. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS) and Libby and Thorne (2004, Business Ethics Quarterly). In so doing, this study provides a foundation by which future audit research can study ways to ensure that auditors’ virtue is promoted throughout the audit community. Copyright Springer 2007accounting ethics, virtue ethics, auditors’ virtue scale,

Business Ethics Research with an Accounting Focus: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1988 to 2007

“…This recent research has also inspected the relationship between the values and level of moral reasoning of accountants (Abdolmohammadi and Baker, 2006) as well as the influence of various components of moral intensity on ethical decision-making processes (Leitsch, 2006). Professional ethics, the ethical decision making of public accountants, professional accounting education, independence concerns for auditing profession, auditor virtues, and principlesbased versus rules-based ethical codes have been enduring topics of accounting ethics research (Buchan, 2005;Gendron et al, 2006;Herron and Gilbertson, 2004;Libby and Thorne, 2007;Preston et al, 1995;Reiter and Williams, 2004;Satava et al, 2006;Sikka et al, 2007;Velayutham, 2003). As Everett et al (2005, p.…”

Organisational Virtue, Moral Attentiveness, and the Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility in Business: The Case of UK HR Practitioners

“…Similarly, Bull and Adam (2011) use a case study approach when examining virtue in the context of designing a customer relationship system and find that a lack of focus on internal goods (virtues) leaves it to be deficient. Shanahan and Hyman (2003) create a scale for the measurement of virtue, an approach that Libby and Thorne (2007) also take specifically for the examination of auditors' virtue, although neither scale has yet been validated by further research. Although there has been little work examining virtue at the team level, Palanski et al (2011) and Rego et al (2013Rego et al ( , 2015 provide support for virtue's positive impact on team performance.…”

Introduction‐virtue and virtuousness: when will the twain ever meet?

“…Palanski et al . ) and of specific role holders such as auditors (Libby & Thorne ) are unsurprising. Perhaps more ambitiously, positive organisational scholarship (hereafter POS) has sought to establish measures of ‘organisational virtuousness’ using the correlational and experimental methods of positive psychology (Cameron et al .…”

“…From the outset, however, positive social science recognised that individual differences are 'shaped by the individual's settings' (Peterson & Seligman 2004: 10), and hence the extension of studies at the individual level to studies of teams (e.g. Palanski et al 2011) and of specific role holders such as auditors (Libby & Thorne 2006) are unsurprising. Perhaps more ambitiously, positive organisational scholarship (hereafter POS) has sought to establish measures of 'organisational virtuousness' using the correlational and experimental methods of positive psychology (Cameron et al 2004;Chun 2005;Rego et al 2010).…”