2022
DOI: 10.2196/31918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development History and Research Tendency of Medical Informatics: Topic Evolution Analysis

Abstract: Background Medical informatics has attracted the attention of researchers worldwide. It is necessary to understand the development of its research hot spots as well as directions for future research. Objective The aim of this study is to explore the evolution of medical informatics research topics by analyzing research articles published between 1964 and 2020. Methods A total of 56,466 publications were coll… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, some studies use bibliometric methods to describe health informatics research through quantitative research methods such as statistical analysis (Binkheder et al , 2021; Han et al , 2022; Liu et al , 2019), social network analysis (Saheb and Saheb, 2019) and scientific knowledge mapping (Zou and Sun, 2020; Kokol et al , 2018; He et al , 2022; Liang, 2010). These studies point out that health informatics research focused on topics such as the application of computer science in health care, the impact of health informatics on patient safety and quality of care, implementation and evaluation of electronic health records and decision support systems (Saheb and Saheb, 2019; He et al , 2022), and future research trends may be patient-generated health data, deep learning algorithms, quantitative self and self-tracking tools and IoT-based decision support systems (Liu et al , 2019), and how to meet user needs and improve the usability of health tools is also a potential research hotspot (Han et al , 2022). Besides, there are also studies that have made efforts to reveal the current state of research in related areas or subfields of health informatics, such as in the areas of COVID-19 (Chen et al , 2021) and big data research in health informatics (Gu et al , 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, some studies use bibliometric methods to describe health informatics research through quantitative research methods such as statistical analysis (Binkheder et al , 2021; Han et al , 2022; Liu et al , 2019), social network analysis (Saheb and Saheb, 2019) and scientific knowledge mapping (Zou and Sun, 2020; Kokol et al , 2018; He et al , 2022; Liang, 2010). These studies point out that health informatics research focused on topics such as the application of computer science in health care, the impact of health informatics on patient safety and quality of care, implementation and evaluation of electronic health records and decision support systems (Saheb and Saheb, 2019; He et al , 2022), and future research trends may be patient-generated health data, deep learning algorithms, quantitative self and self-tracking tools and IoT-based decision support systems (Liu et al , 2019), and how to meet user needs and improve the usability of health tools is also a potential research hotspot (Han et al , 2022). Besides, there are also studies that have made efforts to reveal the current state of research in related areas or subfields of health informatics, such as in the areas of COVID-19 (Chen et al , 2021) and big data research in health informatics (Gu et al , 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health informatics research continues to evolve in response to advances in information technology, interest in it is increasing in both academic and applied communities, and some studies have examined the current state of health informatics research (Masic, 2013; Deng et al , 2018; Zou and Sun, 2020; Kokol et al , 2018; Han et al , 2022; He et al , 2022). Nevertheless, there are still four problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This choice was made by the authors in order, on the one hand, to be able to use all of the features of ontologies encoded rigorously in OWL and, on the other hand, to be able to manage their temporal evolution through the standardized tools provided by CTS2. The need to follow the temporal evolution of said ontologies is obvious when considering ontologies defined in medical fields for which updating is rather frequent [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%