2022
DOI: 10.18280/isi.270201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development and Validation Prospective Mathematics Teachers Holistic Assessment Tools

Abstract: This study aims to explain the stages of developing a Holistic assessment instrument for the competence of prospective mathematics teachers based on constructs from several literature reviews to measure the competence/ability of prospective mathematics teachers. This development goes through 8 steps of developing non-test instruments. Validity and reliability of instrument traced from 101 students. The initial instrument design carries out initially, then validated with the Aiken formula by 14 experts. The ser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the teacher's decision-making is influenced by the results of previous experience, which is poured into the problem situation as a reference for building ideas from the task to be designed. The determinants of the results of task design are based on previous experience, which is the teacher's control in designing tasks (Fishbein et al, 2016) and teacher perceptions based on prior knowledge (Altan & Ercan, 2016;Sainuddin et al, 2022). Therefore, decision-making at the informationgathering stage depends on the experience possessed by the teacher when designing assignments.…”
Section: Information Gatheringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the teacher's decision-making is influenced by the results of previous experience, which is poured into the problem situation as a reference for building ideas from the task to be designed. The determinants of the results of task design are based on previous experience, which is the teacher's control in designing tasks (Fishbein et al, 2016) and teacher perceptions based on prior knowledge (Altan & Ercan, 2016;Sainuddin et al, 2022). Therefore, decision-making at the informationgathering stage depends on the experience possessed by the teacher when designing assignments.…”
Section: Information Gatheringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As explained in the introduction, the instrument, which consists of 9 initial assessment items, is then reviewed for readability by a measurement expert. Experts provide input about the content of each item and see how far the item can represent the construct (Sainuddin et al, 2022). The experts included two other chemistry lecturers, nine chemistry teachers, and two educational measurement experts.…”
Section: Proof Of Content Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good rubric at least goes through the stages of expert review and empirical testing (Basturk, 2008;Galti et al, 2018). Expert review is a consideration for items essential to measuring students' practicum abilities in the laboratory (Sainuddin et al, 2022). Meanwhile, empirical trials were used to determine to what extent the rubric developed appropriately measures students' abilities in practical activities (Bennett et al, 2016;Giammatteo & Obaya, 2018;Seery et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the slight lag in classification error, the VGG network achieved the best results on many transfer learning tasks. Figure 1 shows the structure of the pretrained CNN network [19][20][21].…”
Section: Cnn Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%