1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb02022.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Global Social Power Based on French and Raven's Power Taxonomy1

Abstract: A measure of global power was developed based on French and Raven's (1959) definition of social power as the potential of an agent to influence a target. A sample of 346 graduate students responded to a questionnaire assessing their perceptions of the power of their supervising professors in paid assistantship duties. Power was measured using established scales of the French and Raven 5 power bases in addition to the newly developed global power measure. Results indicate that the global power scale (a) has str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several researchers have developed measures of bases of power in employment settings (e.g., Hinkin & Schriesheim, 1989; Nestler, Aguinis, Quigley, Lee, & Tedeschi, 1999; Raven, Schwarzwald, & Koslowsky, 1998), to our knowledge, there is not an extant closed-ended, quantitative measure of social power specifically applicable to interpersonal conversations of the type anticipated by participants in the present study. Therefore, we developed an assessment of perceived interpersonal power guided by French and Raven’s (1959; Raven, 1992) typology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several researchers have developed measures of bases of power in employment settings (e.g., Hinkin & Schriesheim, 1989; Nestler, Aguinis, Quigley, Lee, & Tedeschi, 1999; Raven, Schwarzwald, & Koslowsky, 1998), to our knowledge, there is not an extant closed-ended, quantitative measure of social power specifically applicable to interpersonal conversations of the type anticipated by participants in the present study. Therefore, we developed an assessment of perceived interpersonal power guided by French and Raven’s (1959; Raven, 1992) typology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other party, whether it be a person or group of individuals, is in position with minimal support and/or confidence. Additionally, Biong et al (2010) observed that coercive power should be avoided, and other researchers backed the notion that coercive power was less influential in motivating employees (Nesler, Quigley, Aguinis, Lee, & Tedeschi, 1999).…”
Section: Formal Power: Legitimate Reward and Coercivementioning
confidence: 96%
“…What is the nature of judgments of perceived power? Do subordinates create a global or overall perception of supervisor power (Nesler, Aguinis, Quigley, Lee, & Tedeschi, 1999) or, instead, multifaceted perceptions (e.g., French & Raven, 1959)? Our model explains why both overall and specific power perceptions can coexist.…”
Section: Perceiving Powermentioning
confidence: 99%