1956
DOI: 10.21236/ad0128756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development and Validation of a Checklist for Measuring Subjective Fatigue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fatigue was measured with a scale from the Crew Status Survey (CSS), originally developed by Pearson and Byars (1956), and later modified by the Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine. The CSS was developed for the purpose of assessing dynamic levels of fatigue and workload throughout an operator’s shift (Gawron, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fatigue was measured with a scale from the Crew Status Survey (CSS), originally developed by Pearson and Byars (1956), and later modified by the Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine. The CSS was developed for the purpose of assessing dynamic levels of fatigue and workload throughout an operator’s shift (Gawron, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forty two healthy students at the University of Michigan (aged [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], English speaking and with at least one year ofcollege were studied. Candidates were excluded if there was a history of exposure to solvents or if they drank more than 18 g ofalcohol a day (12-4 g is equivalent to 12 ounces of a 3-5% wt/vol beer).…”
Section: Subject Selection and Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To predict subjects' performance and possibly to provide a covariant in the analysis of the between-subjects effects, each subject was administered the Eysenck Personality Inventory Form A (Eysenck and Eysenck, 1968) 716-December, 1985 after every experimental session together with the subjective fatigue scale questionnaire (Pearson and Byars, 1956).…”
Section: Dependent Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%