2008
DOI: 10.1177/0149206308318618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development and Validation of a New Machiavellianism Scale

Abstract: A new measure of Machiavellianism, the Machiavellian Personality Scale (MPS), was developed and validated over two studies. Machiavellianism is conceptualized as one's propensity to distrust others, engage in amoral manipulation, seek control over others, and seek status for oneself. Study 1 developed and tested the factor structure of the scale, whereas Study 2 provided evidence for the convergent, divergent, and criterion-related validity of the MPS. The results of these studies supported the a priori factor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

31
692
2
22

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 526 publications
(753 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
31
692
2
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The network-related part of the questionnaire was based on previous tested questionnaires [22] [30]. Questions relevant to Machiavellianism were converted from psychometric from into network form.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The network-related part of the questionnaire was based on previous tested questionnaires [22] [30]. Questions relevant to Machiavellianism were converted from psychometric from into network form.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although manipulative behavior can be accomplished, to some extent, by everyone, there are some people who are more willing and competent for such behavioral pattern than others [21]. Machiavellianism is reflected in four dimensions: tendency to distrust others, involvement in amoral manipulation, request for control over others and request for status for oneself [22]. A study among medical students revealed that they used more reasoning based on moral ideals compared with reasoning based on personal interest or maintaining social norms [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychopathy predicted the most overt and aggressive tendencies among the Dark Triad (Jones and Neria, 2015). Other studies have linked high Machiavellianism to a tendency to engage in counterproductive work behaviors, which includes harmful interpersonal acts similar to abuse (Dahling et al, 2009), and bullying at work (Pilch and Turska, 2015). Leader psychopathy has been negatively related to individual consideration (Westerlaken and Woods, 2013), and positively associated with corporate misbehavior (Clarke, 2005), workplace bullying, and unfair supervision (Boddy, 2011).…”
Section: Dark Triad Traits and Their Relationship With Abusive Supervmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Machiavellian persons are ideologically neutral, avoiding emotional involvement in interpersonal relations, and commitments (Dahling, Whitaker, & Levy, 2009;Mudrack & Mason, 1995). It has been supported that there is a negative relation between Machiavellian personality and conscientiousness (Paulhus & Williams 2002), as well as a positive relation with impatience and everesthisia (Aziz & Vallejo, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a relationship between moral judgments and Machiavellianism appears (Mudrack, Bloodgood, & Turnley, 2012;Pan & Sparks, 2012;Shafer & Simmons, 2008). Dahling, et al (2009) proposed four dimensions in Machiavellianism: distrust, desire for control, desire for status and amoral manipulation. Older studies have shown that Machiavellian individuals follow offensive and dishonest way to achieve goals, they manipulate others to perform better and convince them, without being convinced by others (Christie & Geis, 1970;Zagenczyk, Restubog, Kiewitz, Kiazad, & Tang, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%