2021
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2021.1974988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development and validation of a teacher education digital literacy and digital pedagogy evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account the requirements related to the irreversible digitization of education, as well as the intense discussion of the level of digital competence of students together with social expectations, the topic of digital competence is part of the current issues assigned to both media pedagogy and higher education. This article is an exploration of the level of preparation of future pedagogical staff in Poland and Italy using new ways of measuring digital competences, going beyond the simple self-evaluation that is fraught with many methodological errors (De León et al, 2021;Gui & Argentin, 2011;Pérez-Escoda & Rodríguez-Conde, 2015). This article makes it possible to compare the level of competence in two European countries and is at the same time part of the local and global trends visible in media pedagogy, which are related to the measurement of digital competence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the requirements related to the irreversible digitization of education, as well as the intense discussion of the level of digital competence of students together with social expectations, the topic of digital competence is part of the current issues assigned to both media pedagogy and higher education. This article is an exploration of the level of preparation of future pedagogical staff in Poland and Italy using new ways of measuring digital competences, going beyond the simple self-evaluation that is fraught with many methodological errors (De León et al, 2021;Gui & Argentin, 2011;Pérez-Escoda & Rodríguez-Conde, 2015). This article makes it possible to compare the level of competence in two European countries and is at the same time part of the local and global trends visible in media pedagogy, which are related to the measurement of digital competence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instruments in this study were based on indicators and previous research studies. The digital literacy variable refers to (Carretero et al, 2017;De León et al, 2021) with variable indicator dimensions, namely, information and data literacy (DL1), communication and collaboration (DL2), digital content creation (DL3), safety (DL4) and problem solving (DL5). The variable academic self-efficacy refers to (Bandura & others, 1977;Bandura, 2006;Pajares, 2007;van Zyl et al, 2022) with three main indicators, namely magnitude (AE1), generality (AE2), and strength (AE3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teknoloji becerilerini geliştirmesi gereken ve aynı zamanda geleceğin gücünü hazırlaması beklenen eğitimcilere daha fazla sorumluluk düşmektedir. Eğitimcilerin ve öğrencilerin bugün karşı karşıya kaldığı taleplerde dijital okuryazarlığın önemi ortaya çıkmaktadır (León, 2023). Akademisyenler bilginin doğru ve sorgulanabilir olması için eleştirel dijital okuryazarlık kavramını da göz önünde bulundurmalıdır.…”
Section: Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında Dijital Pedagojiunclassified