2015
DOI: 10.15249/8-2-83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development and initial validation of the work convictions questionnaire (WCQ) to measure approaches to ethical decision making in the workplace: Part 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on an extensive literature review (e.g., Davis, Andersen, & Curtis, 2001;Marques & Azevedo-Pereira, 2009;McMahon & Harvey, 2007), two of the most commonly cited measures are the Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ; Forsyth, 1980) and the Multidimensional Ethics Scale (MES;Reidenbach & Robin, 1988). One of the most recent scales developed is the Work Convictions Questionnaire (WCQ; Boshoff, Kotze, & Nel, 2014). These measures are often used to obtain a baseline measurement of a person's ethical values prior to engagement in research situations that measure ethical decision-making choices (e.g., Henle, Giacalone, & Jurkiewicz, 2005;Marques & Azevedo-Pereira, 2009).…”
Section: Measures For Ethical Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on an extensive literature review (e.g., Davis, Andersen, & Curtis, 2001;Marques & Azevedo-Pereira, 2009;McMahon & Harvey, 2007), two of the most commonly cited measures are the Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ; Forsyth, 1980) and the Multidimensional Ethics Scale (MES;Reidenbach & Robin, 1988). One of the most recent scales developed is the Work Convictions Questionnaire (WCQ; Boshoff, Kotze, & Nel, 2014). These measures are often used to obtain a baseline measurement of a person's ethical values prior to engagement in research situations that measure ethical decision-making choices (e.g., Henle, Giacalone, & Jurkiewicz, 2005;Marques & Azevedo-Pereira, 2009).…”
Section: Measures For Ethical Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure was created to determine the extent to which individuals adopt one of the following ethical ideologies: (1) situationism-ethical actions are based on the context of the situation, (2) absolutism-universal moral principles are used to formulate moral judgments, (3) subjectivism-moral judgments are based on personal values, and (4) exceptionism-there are always exceptions to rules of ethical situations (Forsyth, 1980). Those with high scores on the idealism dimension are concerned with the consequences of their actions whereas, high scores on the relativism dimension indicate their personal moral philosophy is based on the opposite of what is generally accepted as moral (Boshoff et al, 2014).…”
Section: Measures For Ethical Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Boshoff et al (2014) believed that employees in the workplace managed problems from principled approaches toward thoughtful decision-making. It is imperative for supervisors to understand what motivates and drives employees in the company regarding their operating philosophies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…South Africans understood that to meet the challenges to develop their economy and ensure that business was conducted better than before, they would have to seek out and use the world's best practises, especially in the area of corporate governance and business ethics (Price and Van der Walt, 2013). This required a better understanding of the ethical decisionmaking practises of South Africans working for the South African government or the local business sector and of how such practises impact on the management of ethical problems by these sectors of South African society (Boshoff et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%