Rural areas are often characterized by population scarcity, but this does not necessarily imply a scarcity of social service systems. In fact, social service systems may be of greater importance in rural areas because they serve as a congregation point for individuals and families. The social service systems of education, health, and religion serve the needs of rural residents but often work independently of one another. Nonetheless, established social service systems in rural communities are potential partners for the ambitious, committed rural behavioral health provider.The collaboration between a behavioral health provider and a social service system requires a framework for the partnership. Franklin and Streeter (1995) developed a taxonomy in which they distinguished levels of school-based health and social service collaboration as follows: informal, coordinated, partnerships, collaborative, and integrated. Although developed for school-based collaborative health services, the definitions are useful guides for all social service systems. We have adapted these definitions for the purposes of this chapter but have retained the labels for illustration. In Table 8.1, we define each of the degrees of social service system collaboration.The purpose of this chapter is to review four systems spanning education, health, and religious systems that could accommodate the provision of behavioral services and to examine the assets and barriers to such collaboration. In the final section of the chapter, we provide recommendations for collaborations.The four delivery systems presented here have been explored as conduits for rural behavioral health to some degree, but no universally accepted model has yet been derived. Thus, they are presented as possibilities that possess inherent strengths and weaknesses.