1991
DOI: 10.1177/0013164491512022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development and Concurrent Validity of the Procrastination Scale

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to develop a self-report measure of procrastination tendencies and to investigate its relationship to a behavioral measure of procrastination and to a self-report measure of general self-efficacy. In a pilot study, the 72-item scale in a 4-point Likert-type response format was developed and administered to 50 college juniors and seniors. A factor analysis of the results yielded two factors which formed the basis for reducing the scale to 35 items with a resulting reliability of .9… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
324
1
55

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 472 publications
(390 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
10
324
1
55
Order By: Relevance
“…Several investigators have examined the relationship between self-efficacy and procrastination. For example, Ferrari et al (1992) and Tuckman (1991) have found an inverse relationship between self-efficacy belief and academic procrastination among college students. In line with the belief that self-efficacy plays a role in task initiation and task persistence, in the present study we expected that nonprocrastinators will have a stronger self-efficacy belief than passive procrastinators.…”
Section: Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators have examined the relationship between self-efficacy and procrastination. For example, Ferrari et al (1992) and Tuckman (1991) have found an inverse relationship between self-efficacy belief and academic procrastination among college students. In line with the belief that self-efficacy plays a role in task initiation and task persistence, in the present study we expected that nonprocrastinators will have a stronger self-efficacy belief than passive procrastinators.…”
Section: Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo hay que considerar que existen diversos instrumentos de autorreporte para la evaluación de la procrastinación, académica y no académica, tales como la Escala de Procrastinación (Tuckman, 1991), la Escala de Procrastinación Pura (Steel, 2010), la Escala General de Procrastinación (Lay, 1986) o la Escala de Decisión de Procrastinación (Mann, 1982citado por Díaz-Morales, Ferrari, Díaz, & Argumedo, 2006, entre otros. Sin embrago, a pesar de su potencial como predictores del rendimiento académico, la mayoría de estos instrumentos no han sido adaptados al español, ni en poblaciones estudiantiles latinoamericanas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Tuckman Procrastination Scale (Tuckman, 1991). The Tuckman Procrastination Scale consists of 16 items that assess the procrastination tendencies of college students.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%