The deuteron A(Q2) structure function and the neutron electric form factor

Platchkov, S.; Amroun, A.; Auffret, S.; Cavedon, J.M.; Dreux, Pierre; Duclos, J.; Frois, B.; Goutte, Dominique; Hachemi, H.; Martino, J.; Phan, X. H.; Sick, I.

doi:10.1016/0375-9474(90)90358-s

Cited by 310 publications

(321 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

294

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The G En data obtained in double polarization show reasonable consistency above 0.5 GeV 2 ; they are systematically higher than the older cross section results shown in Fig. 20 by the 3 Platchkov fits [Pla90]. The revision by Kelly [Kel04] of the Galster fit [Gal71] gives an excellent representation of the data available today.…”

Section: Discussion Of the Form Factor Datamentioning

confidence: 63%

“…In general all polarization data for G En have given results larger than those obtained from elastic scattering; these earlier data required considerable nuclear structure corrections, as illustrated in Fig. 18; the sensitivity to the deuteron wave function, therefore to the NN potential used, was extensively discussed at the time in [Pla90].…”

Section: Discussion Of the Form Factor Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(14)). The next and last experiment to measure the elastic ed cross section to determine G En is that of Platchkov et al [Pla90]. These data extend to Q 2 of 0.7 GeV 2 , with significantly smaller statistical uncertainties than all previous experiments.…”

Section: Neutron Electric Form Factor Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…5 that the cross section data have lost track of G Ep above Q 2 ∼ 1 GeV 2 . It is difficult to obtain G 2 E for large Q 2 values by Rosenbluth separation from ep cross section data for several reasons; first, Platchkov data [Pla90] for G En , with fits to several NN potentials determining the deuteron wave function.…”

Section: Proton Form Factor Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These data extend to Q 2 of 0.7 GeV 2 , with significantly smaller statistical uncertainties than all previous experiments. The data from Platchkov et al [Pla90] are shown in Fig. 8.…”

Section: Neutron Electric Form Factor Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Nucleon electromagnetic form factors

Perdrisat

Punjabi

Vanderhaeghen

2007

Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics

469

583

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been much activity in the measurement of the elastic electromagnetic proton and neutron form factors in the last decade, and the quality of the data has been greatly improved by performing double polarization experiments, in comparison with previous unpolarized data. Here we review the experimental data base in view of the new results for the proton, and neutron, obtained at MIT-Bates, MAMI, and JLab. The rapid evolution of phenomenological models triggered by these high-precision experiments will be discussed, including the recent progress in the determination of the valence quark generalized parton distributions of the nucleon, as well as the steady rate of improvements made in the lattice QCD calculations.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Of the Form Factor Datamentioning

confidence: 63%

Section: Discussion Of the Form Factor Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Neutron Electric Form Factor Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 91%

Section: Proton Form Factor Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These data extend to Q 2 of 0.7 GeV 2 , with significantly smaller statistical uncertainties than all previous experiments. The data from Platchkov et al [Pla90] are shown in Fig. 8.…”

Section: Neutron Electric Form Factor Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations