2021
DOI: 10.1037/emo0000723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The detrimental effects of mood on prospective memory are modulated by age.

Abstract: Everyday fluctuations in mood can influence our ability to remember to carry out intentions (prospective memory). Theories of mood-cognition interaction make differing predictions about the effects of positive and negative mood states on cognition that may change in aging. To test these predictions, we looked at the effects of age and induced mood on different types of prospective memory tasks. Results showed that on a task which required constant attentional monitoring (event-based prospective memory) young a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possible limitation of the present findings may be limited statistical power. Since no similar naturalistic studies on affect and PM were conducted before, the power calculation was based on effects derived by a previous laboratory study investigating age by affect interactions on PM (Pupillo et al, 2021). However, lab‐induced affect might be more intense compared to naturally occurring fluctuations of affect leading to an underestimation of the number of participants required to detect effects of affect and age on PM in a naturalistic setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another possible limitation of the present findings may be limited statistical power. Since no similar naturalistic studies on affect and PM were conducted before, the power calculation was based on effects derived by a previous laboratory study investigating age by affect interactions on PM (Pupillo et al, 2021). However, lab‐induced affect might be more intense compared to naturally occurring fluctuations of affect leading to an underestimation of the number of participants required to detect effects of affect and age on PM in a naturalistic setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample included 74 participants, 37 young ( M age = 21.61, age range = 18–29, 14 male, 23 female) and 37 older adults ( M age = 67.22, age range = 60–70, 12 male, 25 female). The statistical power to reveal an interaction between affect, PM, and age group, based on the effect sizes published by previous research (Pupillo et al, 2021), was 1 − β = 0.82. All young adults were students at the University of Aberdeen who volunteered in exchange for course credits, while all older adults were volunteers recruited using the participant panel of the School of Psychology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They might have different impacts on decision-making (Nuñez et al, 2015) and result in contrasting findings. In this perspective, this mood procedure divergences could explain the different results between the present research and previous studies with depressed patients (for a review, see LeMoult & Gotlib, 2019) and healthy individuals induced into a sad mood (Pupillo, et al, 2020;Szasz et al, 2016). Second, the present study did not access or control the participants 'intelligence.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Prior studies have focused on the crucial role of emotion on cognition by investigating the influence of mood and emotional states on memory, decision-making and emotional perception (Baddeley et al, 2012;Gunn & Finn, 2015;Pupillo et al, 2020;Storbeck & Clore, 2005;Storbeck & Maswood, 2015). For instance, Baddeley and colleagues (2012) investigated the effect of mood induction (i.e., negative, positive, neutral) in perception and evaluation of emotional valence in stimuli like words, pictures and faces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%