2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2816255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Deterrent Effect of the Death Penalty? Evidence from British Commutations During World War I

Abstract: During World War I, the British military condemned over 3,000 soldiers to death, but only executed 12% of them; the others received commuted sentences, unbeknownst to soldiers at the time. I verify that variation in commutations and executions is consistent with a random process. Using this result, I identify the effect of executions on subsequent desertions. There is limited evidence that executing deserters deterred absences, while executing Irish soldiers, regardless of the crime, spurred absences, particul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Armies have found various means of resolving this dilemma throughout history. Harsh discipline, including the death penalty for desertion or cowardice, transforms the structure of the soldier-agents' payoffs (Chen, 2017). Ideological appeals, such as propaganda and indoctrination, can serve the same purpose (Barber and Miller, 2019).…”
Section: The Social Dilemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Armies have found various means of resolving this dilemma throughout history. Harsh discipline, including the death penalty for desertion or cowardice, transforms the structure of the soldier-agents' payoffs (Chen, 2017). Ideological appeals, such as propaganda and indoctrination, can serve the same purpose (Barber and Miller, 2019).…”
Section: The Social Dilemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, to identify the consequentialist motivations, one would have to hold fix the judges' deontological motivations for different reasonings, which should be held fixed. 42 The concern is that the real and perceived influence of extrajudicial factors may erode court legitimacy and legal compliance (Bénabou and Tirole 2012) and lead to situations where the application of justice causes non-compliance to the law (Chen 2013).…”
Section: Us Courts Of Appealsmentioning
confidence: 99%