2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.05.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The determination of material strength coefficient and strain hardening constant by inverse method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly, in the process of determining material strength coefficient and strain hardening constant, material testing is initially conducted to obtain engineering stress and engineering strain, which are then converted to true stress (σ) and true strain (ϵ). 81 Subsequently, these values are used in the flow stress formula, which can be expressed as σ = Kϵ n , where K represents the material strength coefficient and n represents the strain hardening constant. 82 However, obtaining these parameters involves complex and lengthy calculations.…”
Section: Extensional Rheometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly, in the process of determining material strength coefficient and strain hardening constant, material testing is initially conducted to obtain engineering stress and engineering strain, which are then converted to true stress (σ) and true strain (ϵ). 81 Subsequently, these values are used in the flow stress formula, which can be expressed as σ = Kϵ n , where K represents the material strength coefficient and n represents the strain hardening constant. 82 However, obtaining these parameters involves complex and lengthy calculations.…”
Section: Extensional Rheometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As lubrication detoriates due to thinning of the film and extension of the surface, the friction may actually vary during the MLUT. Zone-Ching Lin et al (2009) inversely identified plastic material properties through an upsetting test assuming the change of friction to be known a priori (see also Zone-Ching Lin and Chun-kung Chen, 2006; Zone-Ching Lin and Ven-Huei . However, it is assumed that the frictional shear stress at the surface of the stack is directly and constantly proportional to the normal stress due to the presence of the lubricant.…”
Section: Multi-layered Upsetting Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooreman et al, 2008;Lecompte et al, 2009;Endelt and Danckert, 2009;Egan et al, 2007;Zone-Ching Lin et al, 2009). The increasing interest for this new type of test methodology is driven by a number of advantages compared to standard tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the properties of material subjected to the double-compression test, Yanagida and Yanagimoto (2008) used inverse approach for obtaining a flow curve equation. As an inverse approach, estimation using a least-square method is also performed (Lin et al, 2009). The parameter of the work-hardening curve is updated on the basis of changes in the objective function calculated from the analytical value and the experimental value obtained from the compression test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%