1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1983.tb12078.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The determination of an effective cricoid pressure

Abstract: SummaryA study of cricoidpresswe was undertaken to relate the applied cricoid force with the resulting intralwninal cricopharyngeal (or oesophageal) pressure. The results indicate that whikt there was a wide range in normal adults a cricoid force of 44 N was judged to be effective in protecting the majority of adult patients from regurgitation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
4

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
20
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as the UOSP values with 20 N of cricoid force before insertion of the tracheal tube were similar to the corrected values after intubation, we believe that our results are still relevant to the clinical situation. Using a different methodology, but with a pillow beneath the occiput, previous workers have shown that a cricoid force of 44 N raised UOSP to 55 mmHg in 50% of their patients and to above 32 mmHg in all of them, and they also had a wide distribution of data [26]. Their mean baseline UOSP without cricoid pressure was much higher at 34 mmHg, however, they made no correction for the presence of the tracheal tube and a third of their patients were not paralysed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the UOSP values with 20 N of cricoid force before insertion of the tracheal tube were similar to the corrected values after intubation, we believe that our results are still relevant to the clinical situation. Using a different methodology, but with a pillow beneath the occiput, previous workers have shown that a cricoid force of 44 N raised UOSP to 55 mmHg in 50% of their patients and to above 32 mmHg in all of them, and they also had a wide distribution of data [26]. Their mean baseline UOSP without cricoid pressure was much higher at 34 mmHg, however, they made no correction for the presence of the tracheal tube and a third of their patients were not paralysed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cricoid force may be inadequately or incorrectly applied, with subsequent morbidity and mortality [4], even among trained personnel [5,6]. There is debate about the optimal cricoid force required during induction of anaesthesia [2,[7][8][9][10], but it has been demonstrated that accurate, sustainable force can be delivered by using a cricoid yoke, even after minimal operator training [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, a required force of 44 N has been taught and the force applied is often even greater than this [12]. This force was recommended by Wraight et al [13] as a cricoid force that would prevent regurgitation in 50% of patients with a theoretical maximum gastric pressure of 59 mmHg. Can we apply less force and still prevent regurgitation?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%