2003
DOI: 10.4324/9780203477168.ch10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The determinants of US military expenditures in the context of arms race

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the Cold War, much of the arms trade was driven by geopolitical factors associated with the arms race and the action‐reaction type behavior of the two super‐ powers. However, Matelly (2003) shows that while the arms race between the United States and the former Soviet Union can explain U.S. military expenditures between 1952 and 1989, it fails to predict these expenditures in the post‐Cold War period. Anderton (1995, 532) argues that there has been a shift from political to economic motives for arms transfers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Cold War, much of the arms trade was driven by geopolitical factors associated with the arms race and the action‐reaction type behavior of the two super‐ powers. However, Matelly (2003) shows that while the arms race between the United States and the former Soviet Union can explain U.S. military expenditures between 1952 and 1989, it fails to predict these expenditures in the post‐Cold War period. Anderton (1995, 532) argues that there has been a shift from political to economic motives for arms transfers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%