2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3298720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Determinants of the Model-Free Positive and Negative Volatilities

Abstract: In this paper we analyze the role of macroeconomic and financial determinants in explaining stock market volatilities in the U.S. market. Both implied and realized volatility are computed model-free and decomposed into positive and negative components, thereby allowing us to compute directional volatility risk premia. We capture the behaviour of each component of implied volatility and risk premium in relation to their different determinants. The negative implied volatility appears to be linked more towards fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, international TA is a floating variable and by aggregating a predictor variable into a lower frequency may conceal important predictive information. Therefore, we use the mixed-frequency VAR (MF-VAR) approach of Ghysels et al (2016) to congenialise different frequency variables within the same empirical model so as to overcome the temporal aggregation bias (see Bevilacqua et al, 2019; Boffelli et al, 2016; Ferrara and Guérin, 2018; Ghysels, 2016). To address the time-variability patterns, we extend the full-sample approach of Ghysels et al (2016) to a time-varying MF-VAR framework by using a rolling window method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, international TA is a floating variable and by aggregating a predictor variable into a lower frequency may conceal important predictive information. Therefore, we use the mixed-frequency VAR (MF-VAR) approach of Ghysels et al (2016) to congenialise different frequency variables within the same empirical model so as to overcome the temporal aggregation bias (see Bevilacqua et al, 2019; Boffelli et al, 2016; Ferrara and Guérin, 2018; Ghysels, 2016). To address the time-variability patterns, we extend the full-sample approach of Ghysels et al (2016) to a time-varying MF-VAR framework by using a rolling window method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to decompose the VIX index the same formula used for the total VIX is applied (see Kilic and Shaliastovich, 2019;Bevilacqua et al, 2019). For VIX + we keep calls only (K i ≥ K 0 ), while for VIX − we keep puts only (K i ≤ K 0 ).…”
Section: A3 Vix Decomposition Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to facilitate a more like-for-like comparison we also decompose the VIX into its positive and negative components following (Kilic and Shaliastovich, 2019;Bevilacqua et al, 2019). We apply the same OTM options selection and filter rules as in section 2.…”
Section: Comparisons With Volatility and Risk Premium Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%