1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00002325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The determinants of sexual segregation in the scalloped hammerhead shark,Sphyrna lewini

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
196
1
16

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
17
196
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The zebra sharks comprising this aggregation appear to be all reproductively mature adults as TL ranged from 1875 to 2460 mm and zebra sharks reach sexual maturity at TLs between 1470 and 1830 mm for males and 1690 and 1717 mm for females (Compagno 2002). Klimley's (1987) sexual dimorphism hypothesis predicts that oviparous species, such as the zebra shark, do not have sexual dimorphism in body size and our TL data for male and female zebra sharks supports this. We found an overall female bias in the aggregation, though the sex bias changed temporally with more males at the beginning of the aggregation season, reversing to a female bias for the duration.…”
Section: Population Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The zebra sharks comprising this aggregation appear to be all reproductively mature adults as TL ranged from 1875 to 2460 mm and zebra sharks reach sexual maturity at TLs between 1470 and 1830 mm for males and 1690 and 1717 mm for females (Compagno 2002). Klimley's (1987) sexual dimorphism hypothesis predicts that oviparous species, such as the zebra shark, do not have sexual dimorphism in body size and our TL data for male and female zebra sharks supports this. We found an overall female bias in the aggregation, though the sex bias changed temporally with more males at the beginning of the aggregation season, reversing to a female bias for the duration.…”
Section: Population Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Furthermore, sex and size segregation in aggregations are common, and have been found to be correlated with reproductive strategy (Klimley 1987, Economakis & Lobel 1998, Sims et al 2001, Hight & Lowe 2007. Klimley (1987) found that sexual dimorphism and gender bias were more prevalent in viviparous than oviparous species, which may be due to females seeking either warmer waters to aid in gestation, or richer food sources to aid in growth for reproductive output. Sev-eral species show size segregation particularly in the use of juvenile nursery areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, R. oligolinx from this study attained a greater maximum size (93.0 cm TL) than previously reported from elsewhere (80 cm TL by Abdul Nizar et al, 1988; 70 cm TL by Compagno et al, 2005; 85 cm TL by Moore et al, 2012). The difference detected between size-frequency distributions of females and males is probably a consequence of sexual segregation, a general characteristic of shark populations that is normally associated with reproduction, migration or competition (Springer, 1967;Klimley, 1987;Stevens and Mcloughlin, 1991;Motta et al, 2005).…”
Section: Length-weight Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Differences in home range use between males and females have also been found in some species (Bradbury et al, 1995). For several shark species, males and females have been found to segregate into single sex aggregations and this behaviour is an important factor in the structuring of populations in time and space (Klimley, 1987;Sims et al, 2001). For terrestrial animals, McLoughlin and Ferguson (2000) suggested that a hierarchical pattern of ecological and physiological factors including body size, seasonal food availability, predation and even climate change might determine home range size.…”
Section: Home Range Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%