The Determinants of Inequality and Income Gap between Urban and Rural Areas in Cameroon: Evidence from the ECAM3 Household Survey

Abstract

This paper analyzes the determinants of income and the urban-rural income gap to highlight the urban-rural inequality problem in Cameroon. It concurrently uses the OLS regression, the conditional quantile regression as well as the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition techniques to achieve this objective. The findings of OLS estimations show that human resources and social as well as physical capital play a major role in the improvement of welfare. Household size reduces the consumption expenditures both in rural and urban areas. The regions where the households reside also affect consumption expenditures. Household heads who work in the services sector and trade are better-off than those working in the other sectors of the economy. However, quantile regressions results show that households headed by the old people enjoy a higher level of welfare in the upper quintiles of the distribution of consumption. Household heads who work in the industrial sector have a negative relationship with consumption at the 10 th quintile of the distribution of household expenditures in the urban area. In the rural area, household heads working in the services sector have a positive relationship with consumption only at the 50 th and 90 th percentiles of the distribution of expenditures, whereas those belonging to the 10 th quintile have a negative relationship with consumption. In the rural area, the average time span spent to reach an asphalted road has a stronger positive impact on the consumption of households belonging to the 90 th percentile of the distribution of expenditures. Being a member of an association has a significant positive effect only on the consumption of households belonging to the 10 th quintile of the expenditures distribution. The study results derived with the help of the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method show that 59 percent of the welfare gap between urban and rural areas may be explained by differences in the characteristics, and most particularly in physical assets and education. The remaining 41 percent of the welfare gap is explained by discrimination.JEL Classification: O15, O18, D31, D63, O55

Analysis of poverty, income inequality and their effects on food insecurity in southern Ethiopia

“…Besides, it precisely depicts the stochastic associations between random variables. The quantile regression model was applied by most previous income inequality analysis studies such as [16,18,20,22]. Based on [34] and [18], the quantile regression model specified as:…”

“…These studies used either income or expenditure to measure the level and distribution of poverty. Most other studies also measured income inequality using Gini-coefficient techniques in different parts of the country [16][17][18]. However, there are few studies that attempted to analyze both income inequality and poverty together at national or regional level such as [5,[19][20][21] and [22].…”

Enhancing Food Production System Resilience for Food Security Facing a Changing Environment

“…More importantly, this technique permits to properly mirror the exact "stochastic relationship between random variables." The quantile regression model had also been previously applied by previous related welfare analysis studies such as, for instance, Fentaw and Appa (2016), Samuel (2017), Teka et al (2018). Therefore, according to Samuel (2017), the quantile regression model is specified as:…”

Epidemiological factors associated with HBV infection and uptake of testing in south west region of Cameroon: What can be done to scale up HBV testing in our setting?

“…people living in rural settings both in Cameroon [29] and other parts of the world [30][31][32][33].…”