1978
DOI: 10.1016/0149-7634(78)90033-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The determinants of exploration and neophobia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
95
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
1
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taste neophobia (Barnett, 1963) refers to the fact that rats are reluctant to eat a novel food because of the unknown, and potentially toxic, postingestive consequences of consumption. However, in the absence of aversive gastrointestinal feedback, neophobia eventually dissipates following repeated exposures to the now familiar and safe food (Barnett, 1963;Domjan, 1977;Corey, 1978). If our analysis of the present results is valid, then questions concerning the role of the IC in CTA need to be recast in terms of the role of the IC in taste neophobia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taste neophobia (Barnett, 1963) refers to the fact that rats are reluctant to eat a novel food because of the unknown, and potentially toxic, postingestive consequences of consumption. However, in the absence of aversive gastrointestinal feedback, neophobia eventually dissipates following repeated exposures to the now familiar and safe food (Barnett, 1963;Domjan, 1977;Corey, 1978). If our analysis of the present results is valid, then questions concerning the role of the IC in CTA need to be recast in terms of the role of the IC in taste neophobia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the habituation task, repeated exposure to a novel environment results in diminished exploratory behavior, possibly reflecting retention of memory for previous exposures (20,24,25). This paradigm evaluates nonassociative learning without manipulation of motivational conditions, thereby assessing function without introducing artifact by manipulation of motivational parameters or the environment (24).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Novelty" is a behaviorally relevant dimension of a stimulus that can have a significant impact on its conditionability (see Corey, 1978). Rats tend to be suspicious of, or "neophObic" toward, flavors that they have not experienced (see Domjan, 1980).…”
Section: Gustatory Neocortex 29mentioning
confidence: 99%