The Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intention of Young Researchers: Combining the Theory of Planned Behavior with the Triple Helix Model

Feola, Rosangela; Vesci, Massimiliano; Botti, Antonio; Parente, Roberto

doi:10.1111/jsbm.12361

Cited by 97 publications

(129 citation statements)

References 117 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

110

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless discussing organizational culture is still on the spot especially when facing with topics on the border (Naqshbandi et al, 2015;Feola, Vesci, Botti, & Parente, 2017) or with complex settings (Jennings, 2012;Taylor, 2014). In fact, in line with earlier considerations, empirical evidence shows that organizational culture is a powerful means to induce desired organizational outcomes (Hogan, & Coote, 2014).…”

Section: Organizational Culturementioning

confidence: 78%

Competing Value Framework and Public Administration: Managerial Insights, Theoretical Reflections and Practical Implications from Italy

Botti¹,

Vesci²

2018

IBR

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Competing Value Framework (CVF) is a framework used to assess organizational culture in public administration and it is widely used in health services research to assess organizational culture as a predictor of quality improvement, employee and patient satisfaction, and team functioning. At present the CVF framework has never been tested in contexts where reforming action is vague and is characterized by changes and continuous reflections on the changes introduced. The present study try to fill this gap analysing how CVF works in a context characterized by continued uneven homogeneous reforms. The paper has theoretical and practical implication depicting also suggestions for politicians.

show abstract

Section: Organizational Culturementioning

confidence: 78%

Competing Value Framework and Public Administration: Managerial Insights, Theoretical Reflections and Practical Implications from Italy

Botti¹,

Vesci²

2018

IBR

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Firstly, multiple external and internal factors have been identified as able to favour (or limit) university TT development in Italy. These factors range from environmental/institutional (e.g., the dynamics of demand for innovation, technological progress and policies) [57,58], to industrial (e.g., industrial sector life cycle and related dimension, the dynamics of competition) [58], and academic levels (e.g., entrepreneurial attitude, skills and individual characteristics) [59,60]. In particular, the phenomenon emerged in the 1970s and mid 1980s as occasional attempts of pioneer researchers taken without the support of their universities and has intensified since 2000 following some specific national laws on university entrepreneurship, ownership of university patents, and autonomy of single universities [61].…”

Section: The Phenomenon Of University Tt In Italy: Evolution or Co-evmentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-Evolution of the University Technology Transfer: Towards a Sustainability-Oriented Industry: Evidence from Italy

Paniccia

Baiocco

2018

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Industry is continuously evolving, reflecting changes in society. An important aspect of this evolution concerns how new digital technologies are used and their effects on innovation and sustainability. Thus, the relationship between university, industry, and government grows stronger, shifting the focus on technology transfer processes from university to industry, at local and national levels. To increase our understanding of how these processes take place, more theoretical and empirical research is required. This paper aims to respond to this call by examining the university technology transfer through a co-evolutionary approach. The study analyses the dynamics of the relationships at different organisational levels within universities able to create sustainability-oriented innovative university spin-offs and start-ups, through the Italian National Innovation Award case. The findings show that the creation of these spin-offs and start-ups are the result of effective multi-level co-evolutionary adaptations within universities, and among university, industry and government. The article contributes to the further understanding of the management of technology transfer by combining some elements from the literature about the co-evolution of social organisations and their environment with some elements from the Triple Helix model of innovation. Moreover, both theoretical and managerial implications emerge, together with suggestions for future research.

show abstract

“…In the Brazilian case, empirical findings show evidence in favor of such sort of academic provisions (Fischer et al, 2018b). However, while there is a widespread belief that university support for student entrepreneurship generates desirable effects (Feola et al, 2017), the evaluation of its impacts across the literature provides mixed outcomes .…”

Section: Inmr 162mentioning

confidence: 99%

Determinants of student entrepreneurship

Alves

Fischer

Schaeffer

et al. 2019

INMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to analyze this phenomenon and identify its determinants using data from Brazilian higher education institutions.Design/methodology/approach -Based on a data set comprehending 2,230 university students from 70 different institutions across the country, the authors develop five Probit models to assess impacts related to individual traits and systemic conditions on five dependent dimensions: entrepreneurial activity, potential entrepreneurs, high-impact entrepreneurship, serial entrepreneurship and innovation-driven entrepreneurship.Findings -The lack of significance in many of the variables included in estimations suggests that student entrepreneurship seems to be a rather random phenomenon in Brazil.Research limitations/implications -Findings pose challenges for student entrepreneurship, as targets for intervention are not clear.Originality/value -Over the past decades, universities have been receiving an increasing demand to go beyond their role of producing science and technology to explore its knowledge potential to produce novel commercial applications. However, while there is a growing interest in ways to foster scientific academic entrepreneurship, universities also serve as a positive environment for student entrepreneurship training, knowledge sharing, testing ideas and learning. So far, the importance of student entrepreneurship has received far less attention than it likely deserves.

show abstract

The Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intention of Young Researchers: Combining the Theory of Planned Behavior with the Triple Helix Model

Cited by 97 publications

References 117 publications

Competing Value Framework and Public Administration: Managerial Insights, Theoretical Reflections and Practical Implications from Italy

Competing Value Framework and Public Administration: Managerial Insights, Theoretical Reflections and Practical Implications from Italy

Co-Evolution of the University Technology Transfer: Towards a Sustainability-Oriented Industry: Evidence from Italy

Determinants of student entrepreneurship

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About